"All The Finest People"

From Tengrain:

This is the thing to note about the staffing of Hair Füror's new 4th Reich: these already announced buffoons have no domain expertise. This is alarming at a high level, but beneath that these bums need to know how stuff works and who to talk to to find out how stuff works. Instead of boning up, they are likely to be boned by their own incompetence and hubris.

These jamokes are the people who are going to still be looking for the light switches weeks later.

All that said, I think this take is just about right:

"If anyone believed the nonsense about Donald Trump's second term shifting away from chaos and towards ruthless efficiency his initial personnel rollout is putting that to rest. We're going to have four more years of chaos and inept presidenting. Keeping in mind that incompetence is at least and probably more dangerous than ruthless efficiency."

"A few things spark this. One is that he's rolling out his picks in a totally arbitrary, willy-nilly fashion; presidents-elect who know what they're doing don't start with the UN ambassador and the head of the EPA before they get around Secretaries of Treasury and State (which is now to go to Marco Rubio, unless it doesn't). And also neither of those selections, Elise Stefanik and Lee Zeldin, have subject-matter experience. Which isn't the end of the world for a cabinet-level pick, but it's not exactly a plus, either."

"Oh, also, Trump has already selected two sitting Members of the House (Stefanik and National Security Advisor designate Micahel Waltz) for his administration despite the ongoing vote-counting still leaving the size of what appears to be a tiny Republican House majority up for grabs, with the most likely outcome a tiny 220-215 majority and a possibility of a more tiny 219-216 or even 218-217."

"[…] Sure, Trumpists put in place might be eager to carry out what the president wants…but they may also have their own creative, or self-serving, or just wacky interpretations of what Trump may want about this or that issue that the president hasn't actually spent a minute of his life thinking about (and while Trump is an extreme case, no president is expert or even has vague opinions about many of the things that government does; there are just too many of them). Or they may only have pretended to be Trumpists, and really be out after their own interests (including self-interest) in mind. One of the whole points of having a large, organized, disciplined White House staff is to fight for the president's agenda in all of those departments and agencies — and to solve problems before they harm the president. Presidents simply can't do it themselves."

Firing the bureaucrats and replacing them with loyal idiots will not make an efficient and ruthless killing machine, as we all feared, it will make a clown show. That's not to say that the 4th Reich will not seriously damage the country —they will— but it won't be strategic, it will be as a side product of their complete incompetence.

So yeah, for now at least, point and laugh at them, it makes them nuts.

I've long maintained that the only thing that may save us from the worst of his intentions is the gross incompetence of the people the Orange Russian Wig Stand surrounds himself with.

What Happens Now?

Nixon's landslide victory in 1972 made him appear invulnerable. He wasn't.

1. "How could Donald Trump have won 51 percent of the popular vote?"

2. "How hard is it to immigrate to New Zealand?"

3. "What the actual fuck?"

Fair questions. Let's try a thought experiment. Could Tuesday's election results have been any worse?

Well, what if, instead of 51 percent, the Republican nominee had won 59 percent? Or 61 percent? And what if he had won 49 states?

Those aren't hypotheticals. Those were the results of the 1972 and 1984 landslides that reelected Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan.

With thumping victories like those, what could possibly go wrong for the winners?

If history's any guide, some nasty surprises await Donald Trump.

In 1972, the Democratic presidential nominee, George McGovern, won just 37.5 percent of the vote, carrying only Massachusetts and the District of Columbia for a total of 17 Electoral College votes. He didn't even win his home state, South Dakota.

In 1984, Democrat Walter Mondale did carry his native Minnesota, but that was as good as it got for him. In the Electoral College, he fared even worse than McGovern, with a whopping 13 votes.

In the aftermath of these thrashings, the Democratic Party lay in smoldering ruins, and Republicans looked like indestructible conquerors.

Now, some might argue that those GOP victories, though statistically more resounding than Trump's, weren't nearly as alarming, because he's a criminal and wannabe autocrat.

But Trump's heinousness shouldn't make us nostalgic for Nixon and Reagan. They were also criminals—albeit unindicted ones. And they were up to all manner of autocratic shit—until they got caught.

The Watergate scandal was only one small part of the sprawling criminal enterprise that Nixon directed from the Oval Office in order to subvert democracy. For his part, Reagan's contribution to the annals of presidential crime, Iran-Contra, broke myriad laws and violated Constitutional norms.

The hubris engendered by both men's landslides propelled them to reckless behavior in their second terms—behavior that came back to haunt them. Nixon was forced to resign the presidency; Reagan was lucky to escape impeachment.After the Watergate scandal forced Richard Nixon from office, this bumper sticker helped Massachusetts voters brag that they handed him his only Electoral College loss in 1972.

Of course, Trump would be justified in believing that no matter how reckless he becomes, he'll never pay a price. He's already been impeached—twice—only to be acquitted by his Republican toadies in the Senate. And now that the right-wing supermajority of the Supreme Court has adorned him with an immunity idol, he'll likely feel free to commit crimes that Nixon and Reagan could only dream of. Who'll stop him from using his vast power to persecute his voluminous list of enemies?

Well, the enemy most likely to thwart Trump in his second term might be one who isn't on his list: himself. The seeds of Trump's downfall may reside in two promises he made to win this election: the mass deportation of immigrants and the elimination of inflation.

Trump's concept of a plan to deport 20 million immigrants is as destined for success as were two of his other brainchildren, Trump University and Trump Steaks. The US doesn't have anything approaching the law-enforcement capacity to realize this xenophobic fever dream.

And as for Trump's war on inflation, the skyrocketing prices caused by his proposed tariffs will make Americans nostalgic for pandemic-era price-gouging on Charmin.

It's possible that Trump's 24/7 disinformation machine, led by Batman villains Rupert Murdoch, Tucker Carlson, and Elon Musk, will prevent his MAGA followers from ever discovering that 20 million immigrants didn't go anywhere. And it's possible that if inflation spikes, he'll find a scapegoat for that. (Nancy Pelosi? Dr. Fauci? Taylor Swift?)

And, yes, it's possible that Trump will somehow accomplish his goal of becoming America's Kim Jong Un, and our democracy will go belly-up like the Trump Taj Mahal casino in Atlantic City.

But I wouldn't bet on it. I tend to agree with the British politician Enoch Powell (1912-1998), who observed that all political careers end in failure. I doubt that Trump, with his signature blend of inattention, impulsiveness, and incompetence, will avoid that fate.

And when the ketchup hits the fan, the MAGA movement may suddenly appear far more fragmented and fractious than it does this week. You can already see the cracks. Two towering ignoramuses like Marjorie Taylor Greene and Lauren Boebert should be BFFs, but they despise each other—the only policy of theirs I agree with.

If things really go south, expect MAGA Republicans to devour each other as hungrily as the worm who feasted on RFK Jr.'s brain—and that, my friends, will be worth binge-watching. I'm stocking up on popcorn now before Trumpflation makes it unaffordable.

One parting thought. Post-election, the mainstream media's hyperbolic reassessment of Trump—apparently, he's now a political genius in a league with Talleyrand and Metternich—has been nauseating. It's also insanely short-sighted. Again, a look at the not-so-distant past is instructive.

In 1984, after Reagan romped to victory with 59 percent of the popular vote and 525 electoral votes, Reaganism was universally declared an unstoppable juggernaut. But only two years later, in the 1986 midterms, Democrats proved the pundits wrong: they regained control of both the House and Senate for the first time since 1980. Those majorities enabled them to slam the brakes on Ronnie's right-wing agenda, block the Supreme Court nomination of Robert Bork, and investigate Iran-Contra.

The lesson of the 1986 midterms is clear: the game's far from over and there's everything to play for. If we want to stem the tide of autocracy and kleptocracy, restore women's rights and protect the most vulnerable, we don't have the luxury of despair. The work starts now.

Mark My Words…

I don't know what is coming, or even exactly when (other than before Inauguration Day) but something is heading our way that is going to upend this election, leave everyone reeling, and put Harris/Walz in power they way they were intended to be. Something is happening deep behind the scenes, and  no one is going to know what it is until it happens.

Something was hinky with this election. When was the last time a Presidential election was decided so quickly, and why did Elon Musk know the results FOUR HOURS before they were released?

I can't honestly believe the Democrats are just going to roll over and accept this travesty.

Or maybe I'm just whistling past the graveyard.