

0 comments

Shitposting since 2005

2 comments

0 comments

0 comments

“She’s not a villain—not to me; not when I was playing her. She was a very devoted woman looking to meet her goals. So committed she was that she didn’t take breaths between her sentences. Look, she had to get things done for her husband and for Satan, and that’s a heavy load, right? Just a nice lady with a to-do list that happens to be devoted to the Prince of Darkness. I could relate to her.”~Ruth Gordon on the role of Minnie Castevet in Rosemary’s Baby/Interview with James Grissom, 1984
P.S. She was upset about the continuity error with the hair roller, but…what are you gonna do?
[source]
This remains one of the most unsettling films I’ve ever seen.
And if you substitute Fred Trump for Guy Woodhouse and Mary Anne MacLeod for Rosemary it all starts to make sense. (Although I think both Fred and Mary Anne would’ve been willing participants and neither one was ever remotely as attractive as John Cassavetes or Mia Farrow. (I mean, John in his prime was hot.)
0 comments

The only one I’ve never heard/owned is The Smiths. That being said, I’m really torn between Madonna, Pet Shop Boys, Eurythmics, and Janet.
2 comments


But I still like it!
But I don’t understand why there is such an opulent bathroom in the lower right corner that isn’t connected to a master suite. I also don’t understand the purpose of the empty room connected to said bathroom. Utility/Laundry Room?
4 comments



…because it doesn’t make a lick of sense until you get to Episode 5 or 6. And even then I find myself going, “WTF?!”
2 comments

0 comments

0 comments
0 comments

0 comments

0 comments

0 comments

0 comments


I’d open up the kitchen to the Dining Room. I’d either seal off the Breakfast Room completely to use as an office or leave it open and make it a media room. In the front, I’d get rid of the stair/closet (and make that second floor tower strictly a decorative feature) and push that wall further into the bedroom to make room for a bath and walk-in closet. I’d add a closet for the second bedroom between the it and the corner bedroom.
4 comments

2 comments










1 comments


Sometimes, I’m apt to forget that.
In the course of my ordinary days, I rarely question whether I’m masculine enough.
I usually move through the world thinking I’m a reasonably normal adult human man, believing I’m adequately meeting the job description: doing my work with care, being a loving and emotionally available husband, showing up faithfully for my kids, helping the people in my path as best I can.
Thankfully, I have Conservative, self-identified alpha males to remind me otherwise.
Like self-appointed testosterone police, they fly into my mentions to make sure I know just how deficient in being a dude I actually am.
They relentlessly ridicule me for protesting a pedophile president, for calling out Evangelical misogyny, and for condemning frat boy college rape culture; these things all supposedly revealing my shortcomings as a card-carrying man.
They deride me for being afflicted with toxic empathy as I advocate for survivors of sexual assault, openly grieve children being blown apart by bombs my taxes paid for, and call out the monstrous violence of masked thugs brutalizing my neighbors
I try to explain that I can’t help it, that I was raised this way, that I am a product of my upbringing.
Looking back, I can see that my parents and mentors apparently all failed to make me into a “real man.”
I grew up believing that a woman’s consent trumped anything; that I should yield to her will regarding her body, no matter what the circumstances.
I was taught that I was solely responsible for my choices, that it wasn’t a woman’s job to dress or act in a way that ensured that she would be safe in my presence; that my presence should guarantee her safety.
I was raised to believe that real men have the courage to stand alone and speak out when every other man around them is devolving into the worst of themselves.
I was indoctrinated by leftist propaganda into thinking that the true measure of a man is whether he can hold on to his convictions when no one else shares them.
By his example, my father told me that a man wasn’t ashamed to show emotion around his children, was easy with his affection, and made sure no one around him felt alone or unloved.
And it seems in all of these cases, I was duped and lied to, led astray down the path to becoming the sad, sorry, unmanly wuss I apparently now am.
Maybe there’s still time for me. Perhaps if I were stronger and worked harder, I could be like the alpha men who mock me.
Maybe like them, I could completely subjugate my identity and my voice to a lift-wearing, makeup-caked serial predator.
Like them, I could also stay silent while thousands of rapists and pedophiles are being protected from accountability by the leaders I chose.
Maybe I too could blame the survivors of sexual assault, instead of the monsters who desecrated them.
If I were as rightly manly as my conservative critics, perhaps I could be as comfortable as they are with the government taking away a woman’s autonomy or disregarding her elemental freedoms.
Given a proper manosphere deprogramming, perhaps I could join the sprawling ranks of perpetually insecure man-children who’ve never been able to find a fully formed understanding of what it means to be a gentle man and a loving human being.
Immerse myself in the Evangelical ecosystem long enough, and I might evolve into a knuckle-dragging amber-trapped caveman who is terrified of strong women and intimidated by any expression of sexuality that doesn’t fit my brittle Old Testament sensibilities.
Spend enough time in Republican politics and I too may one day be tough enough to fall prostrate before a man who has verbally, emotionally, or physically violated nearly every woman in his path, and to still pretend I’m strong.
I’m pretty sure too late for me, though.
At this age, I might be resigned to my soft, swishy sissified state: just another weak, soy boy, leftist cuck of a man striving to live with decency, self-control, and compassion; to be someone a woman doesn’t need to fear being around when alone or vulnerable.
I might just have to settle for being a father whose son would never be silent when anyone else was in danger.
I might be doomed to be a dad whose daughter feels respected and loved by him because she’s watched him respect and love her mom as an equal.
I may be resigned to being a husband whose partner in life has never felt the pressure to be any other kind of woman than the woman she is.
Yeah, I’d like to fight it, but I confess that the overcompensating alphas are right; I’m a beta male.
Guess I’ll just have to live with that.
0 comments

0 comments

0 comments

Sony introduced its CDP-101, the first commercial compact disc player, on October 1, 1982 and was in production until 1985
List price was $730, and the player was initially only available in Japan. The release coincided with the first release of compact discs by Sony and Philips in Japan.
It was released to the US and worldwide on January 2, 1983.

Demonstration CD players from Sony had the disc placed vertically in the machine allowing the CD face to be visible through a transparent front whilst playing. The CDP-101 instead opted for a horizontal tray-loading system. The case and front panel of the system were manufactured from plastics.
The front of the unit featured a vacuum fluorescent display panel to provide information such as track number and playing time, an infrared receiver for the included remote control, and buttons to control playback, open and close the tray and toggle the display between showing elapsed and remaining playing time. The only dial was for adjusting the volume level of a 1/4″ headphone jack.
At the back of the unit there are two on/off switches, one labeled Auto Pause and the other Anti Shock. There are two RCA jacks to carry left and right channels of audio; a 26-pin accessory connector is included, presumably for future developments that did not materialize. There is also a heatsink on the back.
The remote control unit, RM-101, has most of the same buttons as the main system. It omits the open/close button and display toggle, but has numbered buttons unlike the main unit, that allow a particular track number to be selected.
The model name CDP-101 was chosen by Nobuyuki Idei, who headed Sony’s Audio Division. “101” represents the number 5 in binary notation and was chosen because Idei considered the model to be of “medium class.”
Because of the high cost of digital-to-analogue converters (DACs) at the time, the CDP-101 has only one DAC for both the left and right audio channels. There is no sample-and-hold circuitry to delay the first channel until the other is ready, so the left and right channels are out of sync by approximately 11 μs. The output voltage is 2V RMS.
Unlike the Philips CD100 which uses oversampling to enable the use of a 14-bit DAC, the CDP-101 features a 16-bit DAC that was designed and manufactured in-house by Sony. The decision to use 16-bit CD encoding was made at Sony’s insistence, because Philips had already developed a 14-bit DAC, and Sony was worried that would allow Philips to get their product to market first if 14-bit encoding had been chosen.
0 comments

Those three bright points forming Orion’s Belt are Alnitak, Alnilam and Mintaka. They look like three neighboring stars from Earth, but they are enormous, hot stellar systems separated from us by hundreds to thousands of light-years.
All three are far hotter and more massive than the Sun. NASA describes the prominent Belt stars as blue supergiants, with older NASA educational estimates putting Alnitak and Mintaka at roughly 20 solar masses and Alnilam around 40 solar masses.
Their apparent alignment is mostly a matter of perspective. NASA places Alnitak at roughly 800 light-years away, Mintaka around 900 light-years away and Alnilam about 1,300 light-years away in one commonly cited set of estimates. They aren’t actually sitting side-by-side in space.
They’re also more complicated than three simple stars. Mintaka is a multiple-star system containing five stars, while Alnitak is itself a multiple system. What your eyes perceive as single points can therefore represent entire stellar systems.
These massive stars burn through their nuclear fuel much faster than the Sun. Stars this massive live comparatively short lives and are expected eventually to end through core-collapse supernovae, leaving behind neutron stars or black holes depending on their final masses.
The surrounding region is equally spectacular. Near Alnitak lie the famous Horsehead and Flame Nebulae, while below the Belt sits the Orion Nebula, one of the nearest major star-forming regions to Earth.
So when you find those three simple dots in the night sky, you’re looking toward some of the most massive stars visible to the naked eye—and into an enormous stellar nursery where new stars are still being born.
[source]
2 comments

0 comments