The Crazy Is In Plain Sight

From Darwinfish:

This story came out several weeks ago and I apologize for not working it in sooner, but I can't let it pass without at least saying something…

I would believe this if it were a survey of Fortune 500 CEOs, but "most Americans?" Seriously? I'd love to know what it is they think TFG did to make their finances better. Maybe it's all the hype that Fox "News" puts on the TFG Tax Cuts so they think it applies to the general public. Nothing could be further from the truth. The big Tax Cut Lollapalooza of 2017 went almost exclusively to the richest 1% and was made permanent. The remaining scraps went to the rest of us and were designed to sunset after 7 years.

And while Republicans are losing their mind about the deficit, it was this tax cut package that made it explode. But rather than fix the deficit by repealing the Fat Cat Tax Cuts, they want to cut social services and our "entitlements," meaning Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. How is it that "most Americans don't understand these facts?

TFG also rolled out a giant tariff program, because he didn't understand that the manufacturing country doesn't pay these extra fees, they roll it down to the consumers, meaning US.

Maybe people are nostalgic for the days when gas was under $2.00 a gallon. They remember that but forget that the reason for the low price was that no one was driving, for fear of catching The Rona, the fight against which was criminally botched by TFG's administration. No demand equals low prices. Was it really worth over a million American lives just to get cheap gas for a couple months?

At every turn, Republicans demonstrate that they don't give a flying fig about the average citizen's finances. If they did, they would do something about it. Democrats would join them, hand in hand. But that's not what they care about.

And then, the part about how TFG and the Republicans would keep America out of wars? Just because they want to pretend the world ends at our border doesn't mean they don't want to keep the Defense Department and all the Defense Contractors flush with money. Just ask Tom Cotton, who wants to start deploying our personnel into Gaza.

No, there will always be a war, or some other "police action," to keep the Defense money flowing. And I don't mean to the enlisted personnel. We KNOW TFG doesn't give a shit about them… He said they were "suckers and losers" for joining the military. He doesn't care if they're underpaid. But they sure want the biggest and best bombs money can buy.

It's a testament to Right Wing messaging that TFG is even a factor in the next presidential race. Fox "News," and the rest of the Echo Chamber ignore any and all gaffes, mistakes, and complete fuckups, and alibi out any that make it through to their fan club's ears. Even with the glowing economic numbers being released over the last months, they have people thinking we're in a recession and blame it on Biden. It doesn't matter if it's complete bullshit, people want to believe it because it plays to their biases. Like the bias that TFG is a sane, rational, being, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

This is right out of the GOP playbook, from Bush to Palin to TFG. Even when you're wrong, claim to be right. If there's proof, dismiss it as biased. Claim to be the victim of a media conspiracy. Do anything but admit you messed up. It would be funny if it wasn't so alarming. Oh, and be sure to seek retribution against anyone who tries to hold you accountable.

And this isn't a matter of letting all the pressure of this prosecution get the better of a public servant, it's the re-elected president directing the Justice Department to round up his enemies and put them in psych wards. Hang the charges, hang the trial, then hang the accused. Jail them first, justify it later. (You know, in "two weeks," when the long-awaited Republican health care program is going to roll out. No matter the date, it's always two weeks away.)

How is it that Americans aren't seeing these issues? Yes, I know, everyone is busy. But one should never be too busy to know what's going on in one's own country, even if it's just for selfish reasons. After living through the clown show that was 2017-2020, how can anyone think we need to do that again, only with even less competence and more vengeance?

I don't care if Biden's old; he's not evil. He's not a crook. He's not a psychopathic narcissist who will kill democracy to save his own ass.

And speaking of evil, thank goodness we have Mike Johnson to lead the charge against evil*.

*In the narrow way he defines it.

This is a guy whose public statements call for imprisoning doctors who perform abortions, eliminating hate crime laws, criminalizing gay sex, and giving up the right to privacy. (Except for political donors, of course. That's nobody's business.) Basically, the guy is a religious nightmare bent on making his own brand of fanaticism the law of the land. And the Republicans just put him second in line to the presidency.

And speaking of wingnuts, MT Greene is still out there fighting for relevance.

Now she wants to investigate the January 6th investigators. I presume that's because Fox "News" and the whole Right Wing propaganda apparatus can't hype Hunter Biden's Laptop into the crime of the century.

I watched most of the 1/6 hearings; I don't understand what it is she thinks she can allege. I mean, they have tons of witnesses and reams of evidence. And this is coming from one of the ringleaders of the other GOP "investigations," that have delivered one nothing-burger after another in.

I presume it's just more performance theater with an audience of one.

Can't we get Harlan Crowe, or one of the other Supreme Court "special friends" to ship her off on a cruise somewhere, just to get her out of town and minimize the embarrassment? The chipmunks driving the tiny wheels in her brain have to be due for a break.

 

And Just Like That…

…the majority of the red states vanished. Unfortunately their karma also took a lot of the blue with them.

This is more of a thought experiment than anything else, because science tells us that even if all the ice on Earth melted completely, the sea level would rise "only" 65m, or about 230 feet. It will still destroy all the coastal cities around the world, but it wouldn't bury half of North America in the way a 500 meter rise would.

A more realistic view of what a 65m sea rise would do to the planet is in the images below.

45 Years Ago Today

45 years ago today, SF Supervisor Harvey Milk and Mayor George Moscone were shot and killed inside city hall by former Supervisor Dan White. Milk was California's first openly gay elected official and a pioneer in the struggle for LGBTQ+ rights worldwide. Moscone was a first-term mayor and former California state senator.

The shootings were a turning point in San Francisco politics, sparking widespread public outcry. Dianne Feinstein, who was then the president of the Board of Supervisors, was subsequently sworn in as the city's first female mayor.

Dan White was charged with first-degree murder, but was ultimately convicted of voluntary manslaughter. This lesser sentence ignited public outcry anew.

Below are captions for the above photos in order of appearance:

1. Mourners hold a candlelight vigil for Moscone and Milk.
2. Left: Dianne Feinstein bows her head for a moment of silence. Right: Dan White is taken into custody by the SFPD.
3. The body of Harvey Milk is carried out from city hall under a white cloth.
4. Mel Wax, press secretary for Mayor Moscone, announces to reporters that Moscone and Milk were shot and killed.
5. Rebecca Moscone is consoled by friends after learning that her father, George Moscone, had been killed.
6. Thousands gather with candles in front of SF City Hall for an impromptu vigil.
7. People hold signs and candles at a vigil.

📸: Getty Images

It's a Sickness

So I bought another piece of vintage audio gear off eBay.

What follows is no doubt going to be a long winded dissertation from an aging audio-enthusiast who no longer has any living friends with whom to discuss this shit, so if it's not your cup of tea, I won't be offended if you just skip to the next entry of nekkid menz or political griping…

For the last several weeks I've been contemplating dropping some serious coin on a new amplifier/receiver, but keep returning mentally to the incredible build quality and nostalgia of my existing equipment and the urge passes. I'm quite enamored of my current receiver, as exemplified by my numerous posts waxing poetic about it. But still, there's something enticing about getting a unit that's brand new and has all the modern bells and whistles built-in.

Don't misunderstand; my Kenwood is great and I'm happy with it…but there's something missing—a punch, a presence—that to be honest I haven't experienced since the days of my old Yamaha A-700 amp that I bought new in 1986 and owned until 1999. (I foolishly sold it after having been bitten by the eBay vintage bug and was able to pick up equipment I'd lusted over 25 years earlier for cents on the dollar.) When I think about the thousands of dollars I've spent on this shit over the past 24 years, my Starbucks habit pales in comparison.

Anyhow, that's why I'd been looking at new Yamaha gear. But my god…the price! Could I justify $1800 for a new piece of audio equipment when what I currently owned was more than adequate?

No. At least not at this point in time.

But it got me thinking. Can I get that famous Yamaha sound that I longed for…  inexpensively?

For shits-n-giggles, I went on eBay and searched for Yamaha A-700 amps. I'd done this before over the past couple years and was always disappointed. The units offered for sale looked like they'd been through rock tumblers. This time was different, however. There were several that supposedly worked and looked decent, but one stood out that was truly stunning for a 37 year old piece of black anodized equipment. (Black anodized aluminum does not generally age well and mercilessly shows every scratch and ding, unlike regular anodized aluminum which is much more forgiving to the eye.) And it was quite reasonably priced at $350. The seller indicated that everything worked and the unit sounded great.

Next I went over to YouTube and checked for videos of this model—to see if there were any common and/or glaring repair issues looming that I should be aware of before hitting that BUY IT NOW button. Both the A-700s I'd owned (yeah, I bought a replacement unit in 2002 because I missed the sound so much that this is not something new) were rock solid…but that was twenty years ago. The construction was first rate (as was pretty much anything you bought from Yamaha at the time). The internal components they used were of highest quality, so I didn't anticipate needing a recapping or anything (something I paid my tech up north to do with both my Technics micro series and the Kenwood 7400—and afterward were both ultimately put in storage as I returned to my Kenwood 6600).

This "new" Yamaha may need some work done, based on what I saw on YouTube, but nothing that would break the bank. So I went ahead and bought it.

Ben bemusedly just shook his head, but since he is as guilty as I am of spending money, he also pointed out that with my retirement looming in a mere 14 months, we both need to cut back on our superfluous purchases.

Hence the reason why theoretically I could afford to spend $1800 on a brand new receiver now (because in 14 months that will be an impossibility) at this point in time, I won't.