Hmmm…
How AI Thinks The Pyramids Were Built
AI Alice
The Best Use of AI I've Seen So Far
Oh Vincent!
They're Made Out Of Meat
"They're made out of meat."
"Meat?"
"Meat. They're made out of meat."
"Meat?"
"There's no doubt about it. We picked several from different parts of the planet, took them aboard our recon vessels, probed them all the way through. They're completely meat."
"That's impossible. What about the radio signals? The messages to the stars."
"They use the radio waves to talk, but the signals don't come from them. The signals come from machines."
"So who made the machines? That's who we want to contact."
"They made the machines. That's what I'm trying to tell you. Meat made the machines."
"That's ridiculous. How can meat make a machine? You're asking me to believe in sentient meat."
"I'm not asking you, I'm telling you. These creatures are the only sentient race in the sector and they're made out of meat."
"Maybe they're like the Orfolei. You know, a carbon-based intelligence that goes through a meat stage."
"Nope. They're born meat and they die meat. We studied them for several of their life spans, which didn't take too long. Do you have any idea the life span of meat?"
"Spare me. Okay, maybe they're only part meat. You know, like the Weddilei. A meat head with an electron plasma brain inside."
"Nope. We thought of that, since they do have meat heads like the Weddilei. But I told you, we probed them. They're meat all the way through."
"No brain?"
"Oh, there is a brain all right. It's just that the brain is made out of meat!"
"So… what does the thinking?"
"You're not understanding, are you? The brain does the thinking. The meat."
"Thinking meat! You're asking me to believe in thinking meat!"
"Yes, thinking meat! Conscious meat! Loving meat. Dreaming meat. The meat is the whole deal! Are you getting the picture?"
"Omigod. You're serious then. They're made out of meat."
"Finally, Yes. They are indeed made out meat. And they've been trying to get in touch with us for almost a hundred of their years."
"So what does the meat have in mind."
"First it wants to talk to us. Then I imagine it wants to explore the universe, contact other sentients, swap ideas and information. The usual."
"We're supposed to talk to meat?"
"That's the idea. That's the message they're sending out by radio. 'Hello. Anyone out there? Anyone home?' That sort of thing."
"They actually do talk, then. They use words, ideas, concepts?"
"Oh, yes. Except they do it with meat."
"I thought you just told me they used radio."
"They do, but what do you think is on the radio? Meat sounds. You know how when you slap or flap meat it makes a noise? They talk by flapping their meat at each other. They can even sing by squirting air through their meat."
"Omigod. Singing meat. This is altogether too much. So what do you advise?"
"Officially or unofficially?"
"Both."
"Officially, we are required to contact, welcome, and log in any and all sentient races or multibeings in the quadrant, without prejudice, fear, or favor. Unofficially, I advise that we erase the records and forget the whole thing."
"I was hoping you would say that."
"It seems harsh, but there is a limit. Do we really want to make contact with meat?"
"I agree one hundred percent. What's there to say?" `Hello, meat. How's it going?' But will this work? How many planets are we dealing with here?"
"Just one. They can travel to other planets in special meat containers, but they can't live on them. And being meat, they only travel through C space. Which limits them to the speed of light and makes the possibility of their ever making contact pretty slim. Infinitesimal, in fact."
"So we just pretend there's no one home in the universe."
"That's it."
"Cruel. But you said it yourself, who wants to meet meat? And the ones who have been aboard our vessels, the ones you have probed? You're sure they won't remember?"
"They'll be considered crackpots if they do. We went into their heads and smoothed out their meat so that we're just a dream to them."
"A dream to meat! How strangely appropriate, that we should be meat's dream."
"And we can marked this sector unoccupied."
"Good. Agreed, officially and unofficially. Case closed. Any others? Anyone interesting on that side of the galaxy?"
"Yes, a rather shy but sweet hydrogen core cluster intelligence in a class nine star in G445 zone. Was in contact two galactic rotation ago, wants to be friendly again."
"They always come around."
"And why not? Imagine how unbearably, how unutterably cold the universe would be if one were all alone."
[Source]
AI Generated
So SO Close!
I found that if I don't use the pre-written prompt, I can come up with much better results from the Microsoft Image Creator...
While still not perfect (I can't get it to do just a goatee), and the turntable is backward, I do like the overall result. This is the best out of about a dozen or so that I ran.
365 Days of UNF: Day 358
It's The Best I Could Do…
…with the Microsoft AI Funko Pop generator.
It wouldn't give me a goatee only version no matter how I phrased things. Also, it wouldn't let me add Sammy; I had to do that separately and Photoshop him into the image.
365 Days of UNF: Day 342
At Least Until The Real Photos Come Out…
Gay Art AI
Impressive Skills
Yeah, yeah, I know it's "just" Photoshop, but it's still impressive the level of skill the artist uses to restore this old photograph. It's equally impressive the level of genertive AI that's used to recreate the missing parts of the childrens' faces.
Someone Had AI Write A Bible Verse About Jesus Loving Trans People—And Wow
From Comic Sands:
A Reddit user posted to the trans subReddit an AI-generated Bible verse about transgender people.
Reddit user Psychological_Dog527 asked ChatGPT to write a Bible verse about Jesus Christ's thoughts about transgender people.
The results they received not only sound like they could have actually come from the Bible, but they present a different Jesus Christ than many Evangelical Christians promote.
Redditor Psychological_Dog527's post reads:
"I was feeling sad today so I asked chat gpt to write a fake biblical passage about Jesus accepting trans people. Here's what it came up with:"
The Reddit user then included the verse ChatGPT conjured up:
"And a woman, whose heart was divided between spirit and body, came before him. In quiet despair, she asked, 'Lord, I come to you estranged, for my spirit and body are not one. How shall I hope to enter the kingdom of God?'"
"Jesus looked upon her with kindness, replying, 'my child, blessed are those who strive for unity within themselves, for they shall know the deepest truths of my Father's creation."
"Be not afraid, for in the kingdom of God, there is no man nor woman, as all are one in spirit. The gates of my Father's kingdom will open for those who love and are loved, for God looks not upon the body, but the heart.
The Reddit user went on to write:
"I know it's not real, but it gave me some comfort."
What's perhaps most striking about the verse is how well it describes the way many transgender people say gender dysphoria feels–like a fundamental disconnect between "spirit and body," as the AI put it.
For obvious reasons, the post quickly went viral on Reddit, where many described how much they wished more Christians felt similarly.
"I'm not religious at all. Quite the opposite."
"But having read the bible myself, based on what is written there you don't need to make up verses because Jesus did accept and love trans people. Because he preached about loving and accepting everybody, no exceptions!"
"If only all Christians got that memo." —AmiesAdventures
"Jesus: Love and accept everybody, no exceptions!"
"Christians: So anyway we used that to hate people" —SavvySillybug
"I'm not religious, but I enjoy history, and what I know of Jesus the person (as opposed to the version that so many 'Christians' claim to follow), that honestly seems like something he would have been likely to say. After all, love and acceptance were his jam." —FeartheWeresloth
Others pointed out the historical and theological evidence Jesus probably would have felt precisely as ChatGPT theorized about the transgender people of his time.
"The Talmud, the second most sacred text in Judaism, recognizes 8 genders."
"Jesus was Jewish and although the Talmud was not yet compiled in Jesus' time the texts were written and studied by the Jewish people."
"There have always existed non-binary genders even before Jesus' time and he preached to love and accept everyone."
"Jesus was accepting of trans people even if this aspect of his teachings was erased in time by the bigots who call themselves his followers." —JohnnyPoopynutz
"I'm very against religion, think it only causes problems in modern society, but: Galatians 3:28 pretty much says that everyone is equal regardless of everything."
"As well as just his general message being to accept and love each other. Jesus would 100% support trans people." —AnInsaneMoose
Some even dug up excerpts from the many writings excised from the Bible we know today over its centuries of revisions that make it seem like ChatGPT really does know a lot about Christ.
"From the Gospel of Thomas, one of the Nag Hammadi texts, which are arguably closer to the actual teachings of Jesus than the versions that were revised and censored by the ruling powers throughout history:"\
"(22) (4) Jesus said to them: 'When you make the two into one, and when you make the inside like the outside and the outside like the inside and the above like the below—"
"(5) that is, to make the male and the female into a single one, so that the male will not be male and the female will not be female—
"(6) and when you make eyes instead of an eye and a hand instead of a hand and a foot instead of a foot, an image instead of an image, (7) then you will enter [the kingdom].'" —MillenniEnby
Given how much trouble there's been with ChatGPT being pretty openly bigoted at times, it's incredible to see it be able to provide some support and uplift to a community that is under siege both politically and socially.
Can You Imagine?
Oh Snap!
I'm an Equal Opportunity Disparager
Like I did with Tim Cook, I aksed MacGPT to write an unflattering review of Bill Gates' tenure at Microsoft:
Windows of Opportunity Lost: A Critical Review of Bill Gates' Tenure at Microsoft
Bill Gates' time at Microsoft was undoubtedly transformative for the tech industry, but his tenure as the company's leader was far from flawless. From monopolistic practices to stifling innovation, Gates' actions left a negative impact on both the company and the tech landscape as a whole.
-
-
-
- Monopolistic Tactics: Gates' aggressive pursuit of a monopoly in the software market was a central theme of his reign at Microsoft. The company engaged in anti-competitive practices, forcing computer manufacturers to bundle Windows with their products, effectively stifling competition and limiting consumer choice. This monopolistic behavior resulted in significant legal battles and tarnished the company's reputation.
- Innovation Suppression: Rather than encouraging innovation and promoting new ideas, Gates' Microsoft often sought to crush potential competitors. The infamous "Embrace, Extend, Extinguish" strategy was used to undermine competing technologies, hindering progress and stifling healthy competition in the industry.
- Inferior Software Quality: Under Gates' leadership, Microsoft became known for releasing software products riddled with bugs and vulnerabilities. The rush to push out new versions of Windows and other applications led to countless frustrations for consumers and businesses alike. This approach prioritized quantity over quality, and users were often left to deal with the consequences of shoddy software.
- Clunky User Interfaces: Gates' insistence on maintaining backward compatibility often resulted in clunky and confusing user interfaces. Instead of pushing for sleeker and more user-friendly designs, Microsoft's software became known for its cluttered menus and difficult-to-navigate features, frustrating users and slowing down productivity.
- Failed Ventures and Mismanagement: Throughout his tenure, Gates oversaw several failed ventures and mismanaged acquisitions. The company's entry into the mobile phone market was particularly disastrous, as they failed to recognize the potential of smartphones and fell behind competitors. Their ill-fated acquisition of Nokia further compounded their problems and demonstrated a lack of strategic vision.
- Resistance to Open Source: Gates' strong aversion to open-source software hindered Microsoft's ability to adapt to changing industry trends. The company's reluctance to embrace open-source initiatives resulted in missed opportunities to collaborate with the developer community and leverage the power of open-source innovation.
- Poor Security Record: Despite Microsoft's resources, Gates' leadership failed to adequately address security concerns in its products. The constant stream of security patches and vulnerabilities in Microsoft software left users exposed to cyber threats and eroded trust in the brand.
- Lack of Diverse Leadership: Throughout Gates' tenure, Microsoft struggled with a lack of diversity in its leadership ranks. The company's leadership was predominantly male and lacked representation from various backgrounds, which contributed to a narrow perspective and potential blind spots in decision-making.
-
-
Conclusion: Bill Gates' tenure at Microsoft was undoubtedly influential in shaping the technology landscape, but it was far from exemplary. The company's aggressive monopolistic tactics, lackluster software quality, and missed opportunities for innovation are significant blemishes on Gates' legacy. While he undoubtedly left a lasting impact on the industry, his tenure at Microsoft is marked by shortcomings that should not be overlooked.
An Interaction with ChatGPT
I asked, "Write an unflattering review of Tim Cook's tenure at Apple."
Tim Cook's tenure at Apple can only be described as a disappointment. While he may have stepped into the shoes of the iconic Steve Jobs, Cook has failed to live up to the expectations and innovation that Apple was once known for.
One of the major criticisms of Cook's leadership is his lack of visionary thinking. Unlike Jobs, who had an uncanny ability to anticipate consumer needs and revolutionize entire industries, Cook seems content with maintaining the status quo. Under his watch, Apple has released a series of incremental updates to existing products, with little to no groundbreaking advancements. The company has become complacent, relying on its loyal customer base rather than pushing the boundaries of technology.
Another glaring issue is Cook's inability to diversify Apple's product line. While the iPhone continues to be the company's cash cow, it has also become its Achilles' heel. Cook has failed to successfully launch new products or expand into emerging markets. Apple's attempts at diversification, such as the Apple Watch or Apple TV, have been lackluster at best, lacking the innovation and excitement that were once synonymous with the brand.
Cook's leadership has also been marred by a series of questionable decisions. From the controversial removal of the headphone jack to the introduction of the much-maligned butterfly keyboard, Apple's product choices have been met with widespread criticism. These missteps demonstrate a lack of understanding of consumer needs and preferences, and a failure to deliver products that truly resonate with the market.
Furthermore, Cook's approach to privacy and security has been far from stellar. While he may claim that Apple values user privacy, the company has faced multiple security breaches and data leaks during his tenure. These incidents raise serious concerns about Apple's ability to protect its customers' information and undermine the company's reputation for security.
Lastly, Cook's handling of Apple's supply chain and manufacturing practices has come under scrutiny. Reports of poor working conditions and labor violations in Apple's overseas factories have tarnished the company's image. Despite promises of improving conditions, little has been done to address these issues, casting doubt on Apple's commitment to ethical business practices.
In summary, Tim Cook's tenure at Apple has been marked by a lack of innovation, a failure to diversify the product line, questionable decision-making, and ethical concerns. Apple, once a trailblazer in the tech industry, has lost its edge under Cook's leadership. It's clear that the company needs a visionary leader who can reignite the spirit of innovation and take Apple back to its former glory.
More AI Generated Fun
Calling Major Tom Mark:
Yeehaw!
A young Voenix:
On the whole, I think these came out better than the last batch.
The Influential as Homeless
[Source]
Sadly, These Are Only AI Generated…
Casa Blanca Meets Blade Runner 2049https://youtu.be/6RxhyqYUjOE
Right?!
As George Takei Would Say, "Oh My~~~~~y!
I Present to You
Mistress Willhelmina Lee von Fuckstick, the dishonorable Governor of Tennessee:
Damn, she's an ugly bitch.
I am becoming more convinced than ever that AI sees our true essence, because nowhere did I use the word "clown" in generating these images.
I simply instructed Lisa, "Tennessee Governnor Bill Lee in Drag."
AI Variations on a Theme
I don't think we need to worry about robot overlords just yet, but I may have to revise that assessment in a decade or so.
I uploaded this photo of Myrtle Snow (played by the fabulous Frances Conroy) from AHS: Coven into the DALL・E 2 AI System website and asked it to generate variations.
These are what it came up with:
And here's my default wallpaper image:
And the variations DALL・E 2 came up with:
You can also type in descriptions of what you'd like to see and it will generate an image.
A photo of a blue fish riding a yellow bicycle against an orange background digital art:
A stegosaurus crossing the Atlantic:
It's fun. It requires registration, but it's totally free to use.