A Voice of Reason…and Hope

Palmer Report has gotten me through some of the darkest episodes of my own political awareness since the events of November 2016. While some of Palmer's analysis has seemed wildly out there, it has given me hope that all was not lost… and ultimately was proven correct.

For that reason, I appreciate his take on today's events at the Supreme Court. If nothing else it gives me a glimmer of hope in this sea of wretchedness we find ourselves swimming in:

Today's Supreme Court ruling, striking down women's most basic rights, is blatantly unconstitutional and frankly just plain evil. There's just no way to properly convey how hideous this is. But it's also something else: this ruling is just so damn risky. It sharply increases the odds of the Democrats winning the midterms and the court being expanded. It's as if they're trying to hurry up and finish the job because they expect to go down soon anyway.

Every action in politics has a reaction. Everyone in politics understands this, even if most political observers don't. Today's move doesn't make the Supreme Court more powerful, it makes the Supreme Court far less powerful. With all the pushback that'll ensue, and the legal and legislative consequences that are about to follow, it'll be much more difficult for the Supreme Court to pull off deranged right wing rulings going forward. The Supreme Court knows this, but decided to blow its wad on this ruling anyway.

It really makes you wonder why. For decades, the right wing has understood that vowing to overturn Roe v. Wade, but never actually doing it, was an easy way to keep getting back into power. It motivated the minority of Americans who oppose abortion to vote in huge percentages. And because the Republicans never did overturn it once in power, the pro-choice majority of voters never acted like single-issue voters on this issue.

But strategically speaking, actually overturning Roe V. Wade is just plain dumb. It will, obviously, motivate the pro-choice majority to turn out and vote with the kind of force we've seen from the anti-woman minority for the past few decades. Whatever the odds were of the Democrats winning the midterms, and of Biden being reelected, those odds just doubled. And that obviously translates to the current Supreme Court right wing majority being dismantled, either through court expansion, or through attrition.

So why do this? With the exception of cult lunatic Amy Coney Barrett, do any of these right wing Supreme Court justices even care about abortion? Sure, their wealthy donors have instructed them to take that position. But even those donors understand how politics works, and that this ruling likely marks the beginning of the end of their control, not the expansion of it.

One possibility is that these Justices, and their mega donors, have simply lost their minds. One odd consequence of the Trump era is that it convinced a lot of other right wing political figures that they're invincible. Trump ran in 2016 on a campaign of swinging for the fences when it came to right wing evil, and of saying the quiet part out loud. It was actually a highly ineffective strategy, and he lost by millions of votes. That strategy also served him so poorly in office, he ended up losing reelection by an even bigger margin.

Yet because the mainstream media (left, right and center) falsely portrayed Trump as "getting away with it all" the entire time, various right wing political figures have since decided to make "bold" (read: stupid) moves under the mistaken belief they could get away with anything. Ask someone like Jeffrey Clark, whose home was just raided by the Feds, or Matt Gaetz, who's reduced to begging for a pardon he didn't get, how that's working out for them. But has the Trump mirage led these Supreme Court justices to mistakenly believe they're invincible too?

Then there's the other possibility. These January 6th hearings, and the DOJ's accelerating aggression, make clear that a whole lot of right wing political figures are going down. At this rate there's a strong chance Ginni Thomas will end up indicted, and it's not clear if Clarence Thomas has legal exposure as well. If Catherine right wingers on the Supreme Court expect to lose Clarence Thomas in this scandal, then they'd be one death by natural causes away from losing their majority.

It's More Than Just Gouging

I feel it's more than gouging and making excess profits. I believe they're trying to make up for the enormous losses they suffered during lockdown when no one was driving and gas was dipping to under $2/gallon.

I get decent mileage in the MINI. Over the last three months the average has been 28 MPG. Unfortunately, Rabbit has expensive tastes and will only drink Premium. I filled up a week ago and it was $6.29/gallon.

I try not to let the tank get under half full in order to minimize per visit sticker shock at the pump; I at least have the illusion that I'm basically spending the same amount as I used to when I did fill the tank to full from near empty.

This is Where We Are Now

This is where we are now.

Repugnants are just going to REFUSE to concede and every election is going to cost millions of dollars more than they should because nutcases like this bitch are going to refuse to concede forever and a day.

Kandiss (stripper spelling) got 3.4% of the vote but she swears that she got "way more votes."

"Given that my vote total currently lags my number of volunteers by nearly 20,000, I do not trust these election results and neither should any supporter of either of my opponents or candidates in any other races. I know a rigged election when I see one, and this bears all the marks"

Ugh…this is why Trump remains a clear and present danger to this democracy and election processes everywhere and why—paging Merrick Garland—he needs to be arrested and tried publicly

In Case You Haven't Seen It…

None of this is new to anyone who has been paying attention as this has played out over the past 17 months, but it's not intended for you. This is for those in the middle who haven't been following it.

I found the initial hearing incredibly powerful.

This is the 10 minute video from Thursday night's opening of the January 6th committee hearings.

As I watch this, I am still stuck on the woman who says "I am not allowed to say what's going to happen today because everyone is just going to have to watch it for themselves. But it's gonna happen; something's gonna happen"

Who is she?

What did she know?

Who was she with?

Did anyone pay for her to be there?