0 comments
Toxic Shock
From Darwinfish2:
The notion of toxic masculinity has been resurfacing in the news of late. Last week it was the ammosexual family of Rep Thomas Masse, posing for a traditional Christmas card picture in front of the tree, along with enough military hardware to annex Ukraine.

This is one family where I bet no one ever wanted to bring home a bad report card* or spill their muscle milk. “Jeff, you didn’t finish your meat. Go out there and give me 20 headshots from 250 yards.”
*Bad report card meaning a grade the parents can’t argue or bully into a passing mark.
Back in October, before he was calling women “earthen vessels” meant for child delivery, he gave a speech where he called for women to “raise their boys as monsters,” while decrying the loss of masculinity. This coming from a guy in a wheelchair, it seems like an especially blatant attempt to compensate for his own limitations.
“They are trying to de-masculate the young men in our country because they don’t want people who are going to stand up,” says the man who is permanently seated.
It’s no wonder this guy seems to be in a race with Louis Gohmert for “Dumbest Man in Congress.”
Whether it’s political or social, I see toxic masculinity as the source of a plethora of problems that plague our society. Its footprints are everywhere there’s evil and it all has to do with the male ego, with the notion that a man is entitled to anything he wants and if denied, is within his rights to take it by force. Hence the familiar examples:
-
- Men who beat or kill a woman who tries to leave them. Or stalk them, threaten them, interfere in their work or career, post revenge porn, and generally make their life miserable. It’s a shot to the ego, so man must make her pay.
-
- Woman won’t date/sleep with him, she gets the same treatment as one who tries to leave. Must be a lesbian.
-
- Same with road rage, feeling the need to make someone pay for the effrontery of trying to merge in front of him. “No one gets in front of me, they must be taught a lesson.”
-
- Men who are answerable to no one because they know everything. “If I don’t already know it, it’s not worth knowing.” This comes along with the dismissal of any experts of their field. We’ve just had a president with this trait. It would be unmanly and therefore forbidden, to acknowledge that someone else knows more than him about anything.
-
- That includes the aversion to doctors and medicine in general because it would be a threat to their masculinity to be sick or ailing in any way. “I have no need for doctors because I’m too strong and fit to be sick. Nothing is wrong with me, ever.” The last president thought this as well.
“No one can tell me what to do. No doctors, no lawyers, no wimmen, that’s for damned sure.”
-
- Hence the Vax aversions, which by accepting a shot would mean that their own immune system is in some way inadequate or flawed. Or they have to appear to obey some pencil-neck in authority. Neither perception can be allowed to happen. That’s all this “Liberty” crap is about… It’s a 5-year old yelling at his mother, “You can’t tell me what to do.”
-
- Excessive love of high-powered weaponry, as demonstrated in the pic above. It’s not a matter of having a gun or two around the house for protection, it’s having to strap on an AR-15 just to go down to Costco. “Gotta let people know I can’t be trifled* with!” These guys have to have the biggest guns and the biggest trucks, just to make up for the rampant dick fear. If they can even see it anymore over their bellies.
*I apologize, none of these guys would ever use a word like “trifled,” unless it meant shooting someone with three rifles.
Obsession with the military and especially law enforcement. They love to laud the police department. You’d think that would be taboo, to recognize outside authority, but this is different because the police are loaded with the same kind of guys and they recognize their own. Rednecks with guns are basically immune to the police unless they go and do something in public that can’t be covered up. (And even then, it’s iffy.)
-
- They never apologize or admit it when wrong. These go hand in hand. “I’m never wrong, so what’s there to apologize for?” Along with that is the absolute refusal to compromise. “It’s my way or the highway.” Then when nothing gets done, it’s the other party’s fault. “Why should I give ground when I’m right?”
-
- Persecution of gays in any way possible. They hate gay men for being “sissies” and gay women for turning their backs on men. The whole idea makes them crazy so they’ll back anything from beating the crap out of them, to denying them basic human rights, to not serving them in establishments, to being unable to enjoy a simple TV show, if “one of those people” is on it.
-
- A complete lack of empathy toward anyone else. “You got problems? Tough shit. Man up and shut up.”
While this kind of behavior is not limited to one political party, it still reads like the official Republican Platform. Or at least their operations handbook. It’s the kind of behavior that’s appealing to people with limited intelligence and reasoning skills, because it’s completely without nuance, along with being highly satisfying. I mean, who doesn’t want to be right all the time, or be the toughest, manliest, proudest mug on the block? Maybe it’s just “fake it till you make it” gone horribly awry.
Maybe someone can describe for me how any of these symptoms make the world a better place? Granted, that’s a moot question because these people aren’t interested in a better world for anyone else, just themselves and their destructive clones.
2 comments
Exactly.
0 comments
Have You Tried Holding an Aspirin Between Your Knees?
0 comments
It’s Pictures Like This, Posted to Social Media…
…without any context whatsoever that truly piss me off. (3rd World Problems, I know.) But seriously, where is this nightmare? No idea.
To be honest, it reminds me a lot of the approach to the Bay Bridge in Oakland, but the direction of traffic is wrong and the Bay Bridge backup—while it can be horrific at times—was never this bad.
2 comments
0 comments
Always Worth Reposting
0 comments
Yup. That Explains It.
0 comments
Monday
0 comments
Hey Bro…
Yup.
0 comments
Smonday
0 comments
It’s a Laugh Riot!
0 comments
“In Which We Decode”
From mrpeenee:

Is there anything more ephemeral than advertising? You know what they say, mass mind control today, gone tomorrow. And yet some ads live on, almost always because some homo gay has either a) fetishized it like the Brawny papertowel guy or b) decided there is gay relevance in there hidden by code.
Code was the way queers were able to find each other and to express themselves during the years of repression we had to tolerate. Making eye contact with some stranger and then following him into a toilet is all well and good for sex, but for communicating in various media, we needed a way to hide in plain view. And thus, code.
The most perfect example of this, I think, are these weird ads from Schlitz beer from the 1950s. They all appeared as three illustrated panels followed by the internal monologue of one of the heroes.

They all start off with the same pronouncement: “I was curious.” Of course, “curious” nowadays is understood to mean “looking for hot dick, but I want to maintain plausible deniability.” In the Eisenhower America these ads appeared in, the word would not have had those lurid overtones, but the illustrations make it clear that what he’s actually curious about is what’s in the other guy’s pants.
The rest of the text is bland advertising naff, but that’s where the artwork takes over and really spins these beauties into the love that dares not speak its name, but really likes to hint around about it.
Every one of the ads has the second panel with the ladies dropping out to leave the boys alone and with one of them (usually the more experienced one, ready to lead the other down the primrose path of butt sex) sporting a knowing look on his face. A look that says “I’ve got the cure for that itchy prostate.”

The final panel is my favorite, with our two lads now closing in for the clinch and both of them bright eyed, leering at each other and probably popping a stiffy. If there had been a fourth panel, can there be any doubt sodomy would have been involved?

0 comments
0 comments
0 comments
0 comments
Sounds About Right
0 comments
Indeed
0 comments
I Don’t Use Spotify All That Much
Mostly to provide background music for the dog during the day. But still, this is surprising.
0 comments
We are Fucking DOOMED.
With so many people firmly entrenched in the orange and red zones, I seriously doubt this country is going to make it out of this period intact. There is just simply TOO MUCH STUPID circulating, and the fault of that can be squarely placed on Facebook, Twitter, and GODDAMNED DAUGHTER-FUCKING TRUMP and his minions pushing the idea that “my ignorance is as good as your knowledge!”
0 comments
Did You Not Think This Was Going to Get Absurdly Ugly?
0 comments
Where’s the Lie?
0 comments
Yup.
I find it far more likely that ours is just the latest in a long list of technologically-advanced human civilizations to arise on the planet…and like with all those that came before, all it will take is a few well-placed meteor strikes and a few thousand years to remove almost all traces of it.
“All this has happened before and will happen again.”
0 comments
These Were Probably Put Up…
I Have a Dream
0 comments
One From Big Whack Attack
I Just…Can’t
1 comments









































