One of my favorites

I have never understood, however, why—when this album was released as a special edition 2-disk colored vinyl promo pressing—it was done in bright hot pink Dolly Parton Baby I'm Burnin'  vinyl and not a much more (in my opinion at least) appropriate Breakfast at Tiffany light aqua color used on the CD case… or even the pale pink color used on the label of the Bedtime Story CD single.

When I first heard there was a pink vinyl version available, I assumed it was that pale pink shade—because, naturally—and I was righteously devastated when I looked it up on Discogs and saw that was selling anywhere between $800 and $1200 US.  Not only no, but hell no! But then I clicked on the image and saw it was that hot pink color and was immediately turned off.

A Rant. To Be Filed Under…

…if something sounds too good to be true, it probably is.

I went on kind of a Madonna buying binge last week:

    • Music
    • Bedtime Stories
    • Like a Virgin
    • GHV2 Greatest Hits Volume 2
    • You Can Dance
    • Ray of Light

I ordered these from a single seller off Discogs, a website that has—up until this point at least—been a reliable source for buying used media. But I guess there are bad apples in any bunch.

The seller described the CDs themselves as MINT or NEAR MINT. The cases were also uniformly rated VERY GOOD+.

The low prices probably should've thrown up a red flag: $5 apiece, with only two being priced at $10 (one of which was described as STILL SEALED), but it still seemed reasonable considering it was Madonna and there were dozens of copies of each title available on the site—especially since all of them were described as LOOKS UNPLAYED with one (Bedtime Stories) being hyperbolically described as "LOOKS UNPLAYED – WAS BOUGHT FROM A REAL MADONNA FAN NEXT TO THE LAUNDROMAT IN STAR CITY." Okay, whatever.

I checked the seller's customer satisfaction rating and it was 98.9%.  Not perfect, but not horrible.

The disks arrived taped together in a package made of solid-color bubblewrap. My heart sank before I even got them unwrapped, fully expecting the center retaining clips of each case to be snapped off and all the hinges broken.

It turned out that was the least of the problems. (I have spare cases on hand, just for this eventuality so it was no big deal.)

First off, I found it odd that there were more discs than I'd ordered. For some reason she'd also included American Life (sans case, but with the front booklet), I'm Breathless, Something to Remember (both complete and in good condition) and The Power of Goodbye CD single.

Even without the breakage, none of the jewel cases could be described as VERY GOOD+.

And then I discovered that Ray of Light—something I did order and wanted—was just an empty case—with a $1.99 Goodwill price sticker on it, no less—that contained no CD at all!

What the actual fuck?!

I think what happened is that she realized that she was missing the disc for Ray of Light and instead of being an upstanding seller and actually contacting me before shipment and asking what I wanted to do*, just threw a few extra CDs in to apparently make up for it.

To her credit, the discs are in decent shape. There's only one that has some light scratches that plays okay in every player I own except that temperamental D-10. (I'm making my way through the stack as I type.) But c'mon girl. If you didn't have something I ordered you should've contacted me, not just thrown in some consolation prizes because. It's just common courtesy.

Needless to say, the feedback I left will further contribute to her sub-99% approval rating. And I just ordered a MINT copy of Ray of Light from a seller with a 100% approval rating for $2.99 so there's that…

*I had just this scenario happen earlier this morning with a different seller who realized the item he was selling and that I bought didn't match the "official" photos of that particular release. As it turned out, it wasn't the version I wanted and told him to cancel the order and just refund me the purchase price. That is a responsible seller!

Maybe It's Because I'm An Old Fart, But I Saw This And It Resonated

The Internet as a Place to Go, Rather Than a Place to Live

Introduction

The title of this post is not actually an original thought of mine, but a statement I came across on TikTok awhile ago. Unfortunately, I do not remember the username or any other information about the person who stated this, therefore I cannot give credit. I can only be thankful that someone finally stated this problem in modern society so precisely. Nonetheless, this statement is regarding the Internet, that used to be a place to go in the era of the 2000s up to mid 2010s, and from around 2015 up to nowadays, it has become a place to live. In this post will elaborate on that and state my opinion on the matter.

Physical media being left behind

To begin with, I believe that the reasoning behind this is the tendency of people either forgetting about or voluntarily letting go of all means of physical media. Physical media refers to DVD and CD players, turntables and records, VCR players and cassette tapes and digital or film cameras. As all of those means of media became outdated, the majority of people gave up on them and began relying on the World Web as a sourse of movies, music and books, and on smartphones as a main device that not only allows access to the Web, but can also be used for taking photos and videos.

What we let go of along with physical media

Quaility is the first feature we let go of along with physcial media. To give an example, the sound quailty of a vinyl is often said to be the highest. Despite that, very few people are interested in purchasing vinyl records and listening to them on turntables connected to home stereos. The reasoning behind this could possibly be the price – records are, in fact, quite expensive. So what about CDs? Most are relatively cheap and anyone can record a CD themselves from mp3 files on a laptop with a CD burner, making them even cheaper. So it must not be the price that makes people prefer smartphones for listening to music. Another example, regarding a different type of quailty, is about the visual quality of a photo taken with a digital camera, that while smartphone camera quality is constantly improving, an old digital or second-hand film camera will create photos of much greater quality than that of one taken with a smartphone, regardless of the brand and version. And, in spite of this, it is much more likely to come across someone taking a photo at a tourist destination, where photos are meant to be of high quality, with a smartphone, rather than with a digital or film camera. And once again, second-hand digicams are quite cheap. So price here is not a factor. Secondly, we let go of the authentic feeling of incorporating technology into our daily lives. There is nothing that makes you, quite literally in that sense, feel the music better than holding a cd in your hands. Same goes to taking pictures with a real camera and especially reading a book by turning the paper pages. So, despite the higher quality and the authentic feeling of physical media, why people prefer smartphones?

Sacrificing quality and authenticity for the sake of multifuncinality and accessability

The access to a number of actions, that would traditionally be preformed by a few different means of physical media, and those same actions being put together in a single device, makes smartphones exactly what they are—smart. They can be used for many different purposes and are accessible almost worldwide nowadays. Despite that, their muiltifunctional nature means that a person doesn't need to get off of their smartphone almost at all—it provides them with access to a ton of music and movies, pictures of different types of art and online books. It allows the user to take photos and videos quickly and easily, calls can be made and text messages can be sent in a matter of seconds. This is the main reason why so many people voluntarily let go of physical media and before they realise it—begin living their lives online—it is easy, quick and cheap.

Involuntarily living on the Internet

Now that the reason for usage is cleared, we should ask ourselves—what does that usage lead to? Despite smartphones being easily accessible and multifunctional, they are the main reason why the Internet has consumed a huge part of so many people's lives. Relying on a single device for a number of operations, especially a device that gives access to the Internet—a virtual space—really easily causes people to forget about the place where we are meant to live and where we feel best living—physical space. Many people forget about the feeling of real life in the process of preforming so many actions online and living on the Internet becomes something that they don't even realise they are doing.

How do we go back?

There is no actual way of going back to only or mainly using physcial media. Time goes on and we cannot interfere with that. Despite that, there is one thing that should definitely be done—incorporating physical media into our lives as much as we do with smartphones, laptops and computers. Listening to music on CDs, watching movies on DVDs or Blu-Ray discs. Reading physical rather than online books. Taking a digicam with us on trips and vacations. Going to the cinema or theathre. The Internet should once again become a place we visit, where we can talk to our friends, watch a movie or listen to music from time to time—when we don't own that CD or when that friend lives abroad. That is what it's meant to be—a part of our lives—not where we live them.

[source]

The Founding Fathers Were Not Gods

"This country was founded by a group of slave owners who told us that all men are created equal. To my mind, that is what's known as being stunningly and embarrassingly full of shit." – George Carlin

…PolitiFact going through history to fact check this guy was like that time CNN went through history to dig up dirt on Bernie Sanders, and all they found were videos of him planting trees and telling kids that racism is bad.

PolitiFact going through history to double check this is still a good thing though, because it means we can truthfully say they did.

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2019/sep/10/arlen-parsa/evidence-shows-most-47-men-famous-declaration-inde/