I'm an Equal Opportunity Disparager

Like I did with Tim Cook, I aksed MacGPT to write an unflattering review of Bill Gates' tenure at Microsoft:

Windows of Opportunity Lost: A Critical Review of Bill Gates' Tenure at Microsoft

Bill Gates' time at Microsoft was undoubtedly transformative for the tech industry, but his tenure as the company's leader was far from flawless. From monopolistic practices to stifling innovation, Gates' actions left a negative impact on both the company and the tech landscape as a whole.

        1. Monopolistic Tactics: Gates' aggressive pursuit of a monopoly in the software market was a central theme of his reign at Microsoft. The company engaged in anti-competitive practices, forcing computer manufacturers to bundle Windows with their products, effectively stifling competition and limiting consumer choice. This monopolistic behavior resulted in significant legal battles and tarnished the company's reputation.
        2. Innovation Suppression: Rather than encouraging innovation and promoting new ideas, Gates' Microsoft often sought to crush potential competitors. The infamous "Embrace, Extend, Extinguish" strategy was used to undermine competing technologies, hindering progress and stifling healthy competition in the industry.
        3. Inferior Software Quality: Under Gates' leadership, Microsoft became known for releasing software products riddled with bugs and vulnerabilities. The rush to push out new versions of Windows and other applications led to countless frustrations for consumers and businesses alike. This approach prioritized quantity over quality, and users were often left to deal with the consequences of shoddy software.
        4. Clunky User Interfaces: Gates' insistence on maintaining backward compatibility often resulted in clunky and confusing user interfaces. Instead of pushing for sleeker and more user-friendly designs, Microsoft's software became known for its cluttered menus and difficult-to-navigate features, frustrating users and slowing down productivity.
        5. Failed Ventures and Mismanagement: Throughout his tenure, Gates oversaw several failed ventures and mismanaged acquisitions. The company's entry into the mobile phone market was particularly disastrous, as they failed to recognize the potential of smartphones and fell behind competitors. Their ill-fated acquisition of Nokia further compounded their problems and demonstrated a lack of strategic vision.
        6. Resistance to Open Source: Gates' strong aversion to open-source software hindered Microsoft's ability to adapt to changing industry trends. The company's reluctance to embrace open-source initiatives resulted in missed opportunities to collaborate with the developer community and leverage the power of open-source innovation.
        7. Poor Security Record: Despite Microsoft's resources, Gates' leadership failed to adequately address security concerns in its products. The constant stream of security patches and vulnerabilities in Microsoft software left users exposed to cyber threats and eroded trust in the brand.
        8. Lack of Diverse Leadership: Throughout Gates' tenure, Microsoft struggled with a lack of diversity in its leadership ranks. The company's leadership was predominantly male and lacked representation from various backgrounds, which contributed to a narrow perspective and potential blind spots in decision-making.

Conclusion: Bill Gates' tenure at Microsoft was undoubtedly influential in shaping the technology landscape, but it was far from exemplary. The company's aggressive monopolistic tactics, lackluster software quality, and missed opportunities for innovation are significant blemishes on Gates' legacy. While he undoubtedly left a lasting impact on the industry, his tenure at Microsoft is marked by shortcomings that should not be overlooked.

An Interaction with ChatGPT

I asked, "Write an unflattering review of Tim Cook's tenure at Apple."

Tim Cook's tenure at Apple can only be described as a disappointment. While he may have stepped into the shoes of the iconic Steve Jobs, Cook has failed to live up to the expectations and innovation that Apple was once known for.

One of the major criticisms of Cook's leadership is his lack of visionary thinking. Unlike Jobs, who had an uncanny ability to anticipate consumer needs and revolutionize entire industries, Cook seems content with maintaining the status quo. Under his watch, Apple has released a series of incremental updates to existing products, with little to no groundbreaking advancements. The company has become complacent, relying on its loyal customer base rather than pushing the boundaries of technology.

Another glaring issue is Cook's inability to diversify Apple's product line. While the iPhone continues to be the company's cash cow, it has also become its Achilles' heel. Cook has failed to successfully launch new products or expand into emerging markets. Apple's attempts at diversification, such as the Apple Watch or Apple TV, have been lackluster at best, lacking the innovation and excitement that were once synonymous with the brand.

Cook's leadership has also been marred by a series of questionable decisions. From the controversial removal of the headphone jack to the introduction of the much-maligned butterfly keyboard, Apple's product choices have been met with widespread criticism. These missteps demonstrate a lack of understanding of consumer needs and preferences, and a failure to deliver products that truly resonate with the market.

Furthermore, Cook's approach to privacy and security has been far from stellar. While he may claim that Apple values user privacy, the company has faced multiple security breaches and data leaks during his tenure. These incidents raise serious concerns about Apple's ability to protect its customers' information and undermine the company's reputation for security.

Lastly, Cook's handling of Apple's supply chain and manufacturing practices has come under scrutiny. Reports of poor working conditions and labor violations in Apple's overseas factories have tarnished the company's image. Despite promises of improving conditions, little has been done to address these issues, casting doubt on Apple's commitment to ethical business practices.

In summary, Tim Cook's tenure at Apple has been marked by a lack of innovation, a failure to diversify the product line, questionable decision-making, and ethical concerns. Apple, once a trailblazer in the tech industry, has lost its edge under Cook's leadership. It's clear that the company needs a visionary leader who can reignite the spirit of innovation and take Apple back to its former glory.

Why Are You An Atheist?

An excellent post from Atheist Revolution:

"Why are you an atheist?" I've heard that question or some version of it more times than I can count. I don't blame the person asking it for asking it. Like me, they might live in a country where almost everyone believes in gods. Someone who doesn't is an outlier. Someone who uses the "atheist" label is even more of an outlier. Besides, asking questions about the world around us is a good thing. It is the kind of thing we should encourage.

My most common response is that religious believers haven't met their burden of proof. I'm an atheist because I have not encountered sufficient evidence to support a rational belief in gods. But while I find this response satisfying, I realize that few religious believers will do so. I also recognize that this response is incomplete. I've sacrificed clarity for brevity.

What's an Atheist?

No atheist should attempt to answer this question without doing something first. What's that? Make sure we understand what the person asking the question means by "atheist." Chances are, they mean something different from what we mean.

When I say I'm an atheist, I'm saying I don't believe in gods. That's all I'm saying. I'm not claiming to know that gods don't exist. I'm not claiming to know anything about gods with certainty. I'm telling you I don't believe in gods.

Why is this important? If the person asking the question thinks that an atheist is someone who is 100% certain gods don't exist, we're going to talk past each other. They're going to ask me why I believe things I don't believe.

It is also important because it gets to why I'm an atheist: evidence. I don't have enough of it to conclude that gods exist. Until I do, I'm operating "as if" they don't.

Why Is Evidence Valuable?

I'd like to believe as many true things as possible. I'd also like to believe as few false things as possible. I won't pretend everyone shares this desire, but it applies to me. How do I go about doing this? That's where evidence comes in. I haven't found a more reliable way to do it than evidence.

When someone makes a claim, we seek evidence to help us assess it. The evidence we seek usually scales to the claim. Suppose the claim is mundane, ordinary, or trivial. We may not need much evidence to support it. When the claim becomes fantastic, implausible, or extraordinary, we'll demand more. Most of us operate this way for most claims.

If I text my co-worker right now and tell him I had a haircut, he's not going to need any evidence to support my claim. But what if I tell him I had a haircut and I now have a mohawk? He's not going to believe me without evidence. He's going to demand a photo.

What does this have to do with the question of whether gods exist? Plenty. Consider the claims you often hear from religious believers about their gods. If you hadn't grown up hearing them, how plausible would they sound to you? Are these not among the most extraordinary claims we've heard? Why don't we need considerable evidence to support them?

What Evidence Do You Need?

For some religious believers, evidence is irrelevant. Some think the existence of their preferred god(s) is self-evident. How else can anybody explain why we're here? Others value faith, which they recognize as belief without evidence. They think faith is virtuous and worry that evidence could render it unnecessary.

Many other religious believers will point to specific evidence. As far as I'm concerned, the most valuable type involves personal revelation. If your preferred god(s) have been communicating with you, that seems like evidence. What if every one of your prayers has been answered? Why wouldn't you believe?

But as valuable as personal revelation might be for the person who has it, it holds little value for the rest of us. I've never heard from gods or felt their presence. Years of prayer didn't matter. If gods are out there, they've never made themselves accessible to me. It would make no sense for me to believe. Hearing about someone else's revelation doesn't cut it.

It would be easy to get bogged down in the question of what sort of evidence I'd consider sufficient. The short version is that I'd need my own personal revelation. I'd need one of these powerful gods to make itself known to me in a way I couldn't mistake for anything else. I'd leave the specifics up to the god(s) involved. If such a being exists, I'd have to think it could show me if it wanted to do so.

Of the Possibilities, Which Sounds More Likely?

Despite our best efforts to distance ourselves from it, nature surrounds us. We are comfortable with natural explanations. Few of us believe that the raindrops landing on our windshield are the tears of gods. We may not enjoy the sound of thunder when we are trying to sleep, but we know Thor isn't behind it.

While there are plenty of things we can't explain, supernatural entities aren't needed. They don't have any more explanatory power than saying, "We don't know." We know that nature exists. We live in a natural world. When we weigh that against gods, which seems more likely?

If there's an all-powerful being out there pulling the strings, why does it so rarely show up where we most need it? Did it get you that sweet parking space while watching your neighbor's kid die of leukemia? Why do the people who claim to speak for it often seem so despicable?

Take a look an honest look at our world. Doesn't it resemble the sort of world we'd expect if there weren't any gods? Why do you suppose that is? It could be because the gods are hiding. It also could be because they aren't there. But which seems more likely?

Remember, I'm Answering Your Question

Some religious believers become defensive or even hostile in conversations like this. They accuse the atheist of trying to change their minds or even destroy their faith. This is the point where it helps to remember how we started down this road. You asked a question, and I'm giving you my answer.

I didn't knock on your door when you were busy. I didn't greet you by asking, "Have you heard the good news about atheism?" I didn't drop flyers on your porch promoting an atheist organization after you told me you weren't interested.

I didn't do any of these things because I'm not trying to change your mind. I don't know what you've experienced. I'm not sure which gods might have communicated with you. What I do know is that you asked me why I'm an atheist. I'm attempting to give you an answer.

I Would've Loved To Have Been a Fly on the Wall…

…when this was shown to her!

This is one of the sharpest and most savvy political moves we've seen in the social media era. Marjorie Taylor Greene basically just wrote the narrative for why Joe Biden needs to be reelected in 2024.

We've been telling the Dems to use the Republicans' own words against them for years. Looks like someone is finally listening.

He Would've Been 66 Today

Steve Golden

I first became aware of Steve's presence one night while my friend Kent and I were dancing at a bar called Maggie's (or Moon's Truck or His Co. Disco, depending upon what year it was and who you talked to) in Phoenix, one Friday or Saturday night in late 1978 or early 1979. I glanced up to the DJ booth and caught the eye of a handsome stranger, someone whom I'd never seen there before, and someone who elicited the strangest feelings from me. I seem to remember Steve smiling at me and thinking, "Do I know this man? He certainly looks familiar. It must be someone from Tucson." But it was more than that. There was a familiarity, an affection, a feeling that I knew this man on a level unlike any other I'd felt to that time that washed over me. That feeling, though having been mimicked in subsequent years by other men in my life, has never been equaled in intensity to that first time Steve Golden and I locked eyes.

While we were dancing, I asked Kent to check the guy out and tell me if it was indeed, someone from Tucson since he had lived in Tucson far longer than I had. Kent looked up to the booth and said he'd never seen him in Maggie's before, and most certainly never in Tucson.

And so began the saga.

It wasn't until March of 1979 that I actually met Steve. I think it was a Saturday, and for some reason the 10th comes to mind, but don't hold me to that.

It was a fairly lazy afternoon, and Kent and I decided to head to Metrocenter (one of the first mega-malls in Phoenix, now closed and scheduled for demolition). We were walking past an athletic shoe store (I believe it was called "Jox"), and we both saw Steve, who was hard at work helping customers. Needless to say, we walked into the store. Steve immediately recognized us—especially Kent—who'd spent much more time at the bar than I had. Kent introduced me and we shook hands. I don't remember any of the conversation, but I do remember that during the following week, I headed down to Maggie's Tuesday night because Steve had mentioned that he was working that evening.

Time has shrouded the facts surrounding our first evening together at the bar; eleven-some years (when I initially wrote this in my Journal) and now forty four (!) has done a lot to erase the details, but I remember arriving early and chatting at length with him before he started work. It's embarrassing to admit at this point in my life, but in my 20s I was basically living my life (or at least, living my relationships) by astrology and I asked Steve if he'd ever had his chart done. He was a little skeptical at first, but I explained that it was something I did, and that I'd be interested in doing it for him. He gave me his birth information which I quickly scribbled on a scrap of paper from my wallet.

By this point it was time for him to start work, so he said goodbye and headed up to the booth. Not really having any reason to remain at Maggie's further (I must have gone there with the sole intention of talking to Steve), I headed home to start work on his horoscope.

I remember that Mercury was retrograde at the time and Kent chided me no end for attempting to cast a chart under those conditions—never mind beginning a relationship, because that's what it was. I remember it took me at least two tries to get the calculations correct.

I returned to the bar a week later with the chart in hand.

Upon my arrival, I met Steve and gave him the typed reading. I remember being taken up into the booth (the first of what was to be many times over the following years), and the rush I felt when I was invited into the inner sanctum. He asked me what the chart said. (It's odd, but people generally do that, even when handing them a written printout.) I mentioned that among other things, that he was very uncomfortable in large crowds. He said that was true; that's why he enjoyed being up in the booth so much, above it all. A bit later when we'd gotten off the subject of astrology and onto the subject of music, I mentioned to Steve that I'd been having a very hard time finding the version of Let Them Dance by an artist called D.C. LaRue that I'd heard played in the bar. I must have told him I'd bought the album and the version it contained was decidedly different, because he immediately pulled out a 12" single and handed it to me, telling me I could have it in thanks for the work I'd done for him.

It was shortly thereafter that he said I'd have to leave the booth; Jack (the head DJ) was due in at any moment or some such, and he frowned upon people being in the booth. Considering the amount of drug use that routinely occurred in that—and subsequent booths where Steve and Jack were jointly employed—it is quite understandable.

Over the next several weeks our friendship started to grow. I was taken up to  the booth on several more occasions and remember one time in particular I gave Steve a pair of earplugs. He asked if these were to wear at home so he wouldn't have to listen to his partner Tom's rantings. I told him no, that they were to protect his hearing while at work. (I'd discovered, quite by accident, that I could understand the lyrics to most of the songs while at the bar if I wore earplugs — not to mention saving myself from that awful ringing in my ears that would often last till the next morning!) He laughed it off but thanked me anyway.

As time went by, I became increasingly aware of the tensions between Steve and his lover. Being the naive twenty-year-old that I was (Steve was 21), I thought I would be able to whisk Steve away from all that and give him something more. What I didn't understand at the time was that Steve actually seemed to enjoy that kind of interaction with Tom. They'd been together three years at the point that I met him—and were together an additional four years before finally breaking up.

But I'm getting ahead of myself.

I started work at Hallcraft Homes during 1979. They had an older gentleman working there as a courier who would go to the various job sites and make pickups and deliveries. Something happened—I think he went into the hospital—and Hallcraft needed a new delivery person in a hurry. Steve had just been laid off from Jox (the store was closing), so I told him of the opening. He came down, interviewed, and was hired. That's when the chemistry really started between us—and apparently Tom started viewing me as a major threat to their relationship.

I was in love with Steve. There are no bones about it. I adored the man. There was a bond between us that seemed to transverse space and time. Many months earlier I had told him that I felt I had known him from another life. He admitted feeling a certain familiarity when we first met that he couldn't explain. Not a believer in metaphysical things, he wouldn't go so far as to agree to a past-life collaboration, but then again, he couldn't come up with any other explanation.

My record collection was steadily growing with the help of Mr. Golden. And I was responding by giving him paintings. During the one-and-only time he was in my house, he mentioned how much he liked the painting I had hanging over my bed ("Not Even Death Shall Part Us"). Remembering that, I did a variation of that theme and gave it to him sometime later. I gave him one other, but unfortunately, because of Tom's innate jealousy, Steve kept the paintings in the basement of the Hallcraft building where he worked and when he left their employ, he forgot they were there. By the time that I'd questioned him as to their whereabouts it was far too late to retrieve them. God only knows where they are now, and I can't help but wonder if they will eventually find their way to the bottom of a public landfill or into the hands of an esoteric art collector — and eventually onto the walls of some hallowed museum long after I've left this planet.

Anyway, by way of Steve's generosity, I now had dozens of "Not for Resale" 12-inch singles and albums (a good many of which were impossible to purchase commercially, and an equal number which would never make it commercially). There was one evening in particular I remember because he gave me an album that turned out to be quite a surprise.

I had been pestering Steve for weeks to get me a copy of Heaven Must Have Sent You by Bonnie Pointer. What he inadvertently gave me instead was a copy of Hott City, a record and group I'd never heard of (one of the very few records that survived my massive vinyl purge in 1988, a story for another time). I took it out to the car, slid it out of the jacket and discovered it was pressed on white vinyl. While it wasn't what I'd asked for, the fact that it was pressed on white vinyl more than made up for it. I went back inside and told Steve that it wasn't Bonnie Pointer that he'd given me and that apparently he'd gotten my request confused with someone else's. It was probably the only time I can honestly say that Steve was pissed off at me—and rightly so for being so ungrateful. Adding insult to injury, I mentioned that the album was white vinyl.  Since not even his copy was white, he wanted me to bring it back. Childishly I refused, saying something like, "No, I think I'll keep it."

It's amazing that he even spoke to me again after that incident, but at the same time it was really no surprise after I discovered the depth of Steve's compassion and forgiveness during a rather unpleasant incident at Hallcraft several months later. This particular incident came about because of my own insecurities, pure and simple. I loved the man, and though he may have felt the same way (at that time I didn't know for sure) he wasn't showing me in a way that registered and I felt it had to be put to the test.

What a dolt I was—the man was giving me at least 25% of the recordings he himself received from the record companies, and yet I couldn't see that was his way of telling me how much he cared for me. I suppose that's why they say hindsight is always 20/20.

Anyway, one afternoon Steve came into my office with a whole box of new records that he'd received and wanted me to have. I'd reached the end of my rope with him for never uttering a single "I love you Mark" and decided the only way I could show him that I was upset was to return the entire box to him and not speak to him for a while. It was difficult, to say the least, to maintain this silence, and looking back on it now, it was probably a stupid thing to do, but for better or worse, it elicited the kind of response I wanted. After a week of not speaking, I delivered a letter to him down in the basement of the building. We agreed to meet for lunch later that week to discuss things.

Our lunch was at Café Casino, a small French chain restaurant near to work. My stomach was doing somersaults all morning, so it came as a great relief when lunchtime finally arrived and we walked over to the restaurant.

In the letter I'd told Steve that I loved him. He told me over lunch that he loved me as well, but that Tom was number one in his life. And while their relationship wasn't ideal, Tom was helping him with so many things he needed to work on, that there was no way he was going to leave him.

Just to hear Steve say that yes, he did love me, was enough. We both shed a few tears at our new found understanding. And, smiling, I asked if I could still have that box of records.

The winds of change hit Hallcraft. My dad (who hired me) and I both found ourselves out of work. I took a couple weeks to lay out in the sun and relax before hitting the pavement again. It was during this time I decided I was going to try and find something else to do besides architecture (since architectural drafting jobs were few and far between at the time). I eventually started working as a legal messenger for Lewis & Roca, Attorneys at Law.

To sum up, it was shortly after I started working there that the other messenger I worked with was promoted to some other position in the company, and again, a firm I worked for was in dire need of a messenger. At some point between the time I started to work for L&R and the time this need arose, Steve was fired from Hallcraft. (Supposedly he was caught with his pants down at a public toilet in Papago Park. Oops.)

Anyway, I called him and told him another job was available if he wanted it. And so our relationship continued, albeit much different than at Hallcraft. For starters, our supervisor, Bette Jones, was a lesbian—and she had us clocked from the beginning. Let's just say we all had a wonderful "understanding." (It was 1980 after all.) My relationship with Steve deepened, and while Steve still wasn't getting along well with Tom, I had pretty much abandoned all hope of snatching him away.

By August of that year, I was headed back to Tucson. I'd met a boy there at the end of June, and while it ultimately didn't last more than a couple months, it was the impetus that finally got me moved out of my parents' house and on my own. Steve stayed on at L&R for three more years.

My relocation to Tucson did nothing to lessen my feelings for Mr. Golden, but being a hundred miles away and becoming involved in my own newfound adventures, it was impractical to do anything save write an occasional letter. At first I didn't get many responses from Steve, save for an occasional list of his "Top 10" songs from the bar and a hastily scribbled "everything's great" note. But it was sometime in 1981 or 1982, long after I'd met Dennis (my first partner) and we'd moved in together that the letters from Steve started arriving.

I tried to track down those cards and letters when I originally wrote this in 1990, but was unsuccessful. I'd hoped to be able to quote extended passages here instead of trying to pluck them from memory. I'd removed them from their repository several months prior, and remember putting them somewhere when I'd finished with them, certainly not to their normal place among my others cards and letters—knowing full well that I'd never remember where I put them. True to form, I couldn't seem to lay my hands on them. I know eventually I did find them and put them somewhere safe, but god only knows where they are now after the fire. (Reasonably sure they're in our storage unit, but I'm not going to go to the effort of trying to find them.)

To sum up the thrust of those cards and letters in one sentence as Steve so aptly did, was to say, "I love you. You're special in my life and no one can ever change that."

Dennis and I drove up to Phoenix several Friday or Saturday nights during our time together. We both were in dire need of new music, and I wanted to see Steve, so the four-hour round trip seemed justified. Even now some of my fondest memories of Dennis surround our late night/early morning trips back to Tucson in driving rain or bitter cold.

Dennis and I had discussed at length the subject of soulmates, and Dennis had felt that Steve and I—not he and I—shared that dubious distinction. How would I know? Dennis wasn't sure, other than to say that sooner or later I'd get a sign.

The moment that sign appeared obviously stands out in my memory. Dennis and I had driven to Phoenix one Friday night, arriving at Steve's new venue, Hotbods. It was the "replacement" for Maggie's, opened several months after the neighbors surrounding Maggie's succeeded in having it shut down. Anyway, that night, I'd given Steve several blank cassettes so he could tape for me during the evening. It was my first exposure to the music of Patrick Cowley, and I was in heaven. Later on that evening, Steve came over the P.A. and said, "Mark, this is for you." He then proceeded to play We are One by Paradise Express. I looked up at him and the tears started streaming from my eyes. It was the sign. He just stood there with that inscrutable smile on his face, looking down at me. It was shortly thereafter that Dennis and I decided to drive back to Tucson. We caught Steve's attention and after putting another song on, came down to wish us goodbye. He handed me the tapes he'd made, kissed me, and said that he loved me.

Needless to say, I was flying all the way home and for several weeks afterward.

It was sometime after this that Dennis and I went through our trial separation, with him heading off to Texas to find himself, and me remaining in Tucson to get back in touch with my own self. It was during this time that my relationship with Steve reached a level of intensity and sharing that I would have found unbelievable even two years earlier.

We started a regular correspondence, and I made that trip to Phoenix more and more frequently, staying overnight with my grandparents in Sun City. Steve made many more tapes of new music for me, but none meant as much to me as the one containing the Paradise Express song (even though his dedication did not show up on the tape). Funny thing is, I no longer have any of those tapes he made, and have no idea what happened to them. Anyway, things between Steve and Tom had reached a new level of disharmony, and we both expected divorce to be imminent. It was during the spring of 1983 that Steve and I actually started discussing the possibility of becoming lovers after he made the split with Tom. It made my heart go pitter-patter, and I convinced myself of the inevitability of this course of action. Unfortunately, I was proven wrong. (And looking back over the course of events in my life since that time, I can only say, "Thank God!") The following summer Steve and Tom resolved their differences, Dennis came back from Dallas (at my urging), and he and I relocated from Tucson back to Phoenix so he could attend ASU.

It seemed that upon my return to Phoenix, however, that Steve became…distant. His first love (who was not Tom as I'd always assumed) had re-entered his life, breezing in from San Francisco one day and as they say, sucked all the oxygen out of the room. I suppose I'll never know the details of what happened, but in November of 1983, only three short months after my return to Phoenix, Steve told me that he'd broken up with Tom, had gotten back together with his ex, and was moving to San Francisco.

I was devistated. Had I been led along the primrose path all those years? I don't think so. What I think happened was that Steve was feeling too much pressure—from Tom, from work, from his situation at Hotbods, and not least of all, from me—and his ex represented an escape; a return to simpler times. I really can't blame him. Faced with the same situation, I would have undoubtedly   done the same.

It was that telephone conversation in November that I last heard from Mr. Golden. I managed to track him down in San Francisco shortly after he'd arrived (he was listed in the phone book), and sent a few letters, but never received a reply. In 1985 I sent him a birthday card with "Address Correction Requested" imprinted on the envelope. It returned to me several weeks later with an address in Thousand Oaks. Again, I sent several letters, and still received only silence.

It was rather ironic learning that during his brief tenure in The City, Steve had lived just up the street from where I lived at the time, in the 800-block of 14th Street. It was an absolute wonder we never ran into each other.

Despite that prolonged silence, he still crept into my dreams now and then, and without fail I'd see his face, feel the love radiating and awake with a smile. I was finally able to get in touch with Tom (his last partner in Phoenix) sometime in the late 90s and learned that Steve had died from AIDS-related complications in January of '91.

Do I regret the fact that Steve and I never became lovers? I can unequivocally say no, I don't. Because the Steve saga—along with everything else that happened in my life prior to 2008—all happened to bring me to Ben. And I wouldn't change that for anything.