Well, we dodged at least one bullet today. 45's extra super special "Religious Freedom" EO doesn't explicitly allow discrimination against LGBT folks as previously feared. It's more of a feel-good-but-has-no-real-teeth-behind-it proclamation that might make it easier for churches and other religious groups to engage in politics without endangering their tax-exempt status. It does not appear to have any backdoor anti-gay discrimination language and its scope would be simply limited to employer-provided insurance and churches which endorse candidates. While the "christian" reich-wing wants full repeal of the Johnson amendment that put the whole church-taxation trigger in place, that isn't going to happen by way of a simple, crayon-scrawled Executive Order.
It should be noted that if there is anything in the order that runs counter to the Johnson Amendment, it cannot take effect without congressional action to repeal Jonson, but right on cue—because of course—one pencil-neck white male republican congressman from Indiana stood up today and advocated for a full repeal of said amendment.
Nothing triggers those Whitejesus® freaks like that pesky separation of church-and-state thing.
According to an article over at The Hill, "some social conservatives voiced frustration the order does not include provisions to allow them to oppose LGBT rights on religious grounds." While an earlier draft of the religious liberty order would have let federal contractors discriminate against LGBT employees based on faith beliefs, Thursday's version did not include such provisions, so naturally their panties are in a twist. Those "social conservatives" don't really care about "religious liberty" in any other context, so since this EO doesn't explicitly let them screw over gay people, they naturally aren't going to be happy.
Poor babies!
But the question I have (sort of prompted by the graphic above) is what happens when say, oh…I dunno…a Muslim congregation or Imam starts advocating politically? Is that allowed, or will it prompt a visit from Homeland Security?
Oh stupid me…I already know the answer to that! "Religious Liberty" only applies to Christians!
Or the Catholics. Evangelicals hate Catholics. I learned this from Evangelicals who work in my store who have no problem calling Catholics either false or phony.
xstains suck!