Category: Because It's True

Posted on

Quote of the Day

In the end, Trump did what he said. He built a wall around America and made the world pay for it. He just never told Americans they'd be stuck inside." ~ @indica on Twitter

American passports are—for the moment—absolutely worthless.

Posted on

Lying, Ignorant, Or Delusional?

From gregfallis.com:

So, what do you think? Is he lying? Ignorant? Or delusional? Me, I'm inclined to go with lying, with ignorant coming in a close second — but it's impossible to completely rule out delusional. I could be talking about any number of Comrade Trump's recent comments, but I'm focusing on this one particular Tweet for now.


He's not entirely wrong about that whole 'scandal of our times' business. But the scandal is we have a president who is either lying about the coming election, ignorant of how mail-in balloting is done, or suffering from paranoid delusions. It's got to be one of those.

I've voted by mail. It's dead easy, and its secure. Here's how it worked for me:

After you fill out the ballot, you put it in an envelope labeled 'Secrecy Envelope', and seal the envelope. The Secrecy Envelope is then placed in an 'Affidavit Envelope', which you have to sign and date and seal that as well. The Affidavit Envelope is then placed in the 'Return Envelope', which also has to be sealed. All of these envelopes are the old-fashioned lick-and-seal type, not the fancy new remove-a-strip-and-press type. If you want to vote Absentee, you have to be willing to sacrifice a lot of saliva.

What I didn't say — and didn't know at the time — is that the Return Envelope had a unique barcode for each ballot to insure the individual ballot corresponded with the envelope. Nor was I aware that my signature on the Affidavit Envelope could be quickly compared to my signature which is kept on file by the local election office (you'll recall you had to sign up to vote the very first time; you also signed in to register for every earlier in-person election).

That level of voting security — signature verification, ballot barcode verification — is only the beginning. The ballot itself has been tested to insure the ballot scanners will read ONLY authentic ballots, and only authentic ballots for that particular election cycle. The scanners aren't able to read ballots from previous election cycles, even if those ballots were created to use the same scanning system.

But wait, there's more. There are 3,007 counties in the United States. There are another 236 first-order administrative divisions, which are basically counties by other names (for example, Louisiana has parishes instead of counties, Alaska has boroughs, and the District of Columbia has…well, the District of Columbia). Why is that important? Because there is NO national ballot.

That's right. Every voting jurisdiction designs and creates its own unique ballot. We're talking the typeface, the weight of the paper used for the ballot, the size of the ballot, the phrasing of the text instructing the voter on how to vote by mail, the envelope in which the ballot is mailed to the voter, the security envelope containing the marked ballot to be returned, and the actual return envelope. These designs are deliberately changed from election to election.

So in order for Comrade Trump's claim that "millions of mail-in ballots will be printed by foreign countries, and others" to be true, those foreign countries (and 'others' — I have no idea WTF he could possibly mean by 'others') would have to exactly duplicate thousands of distinctly different ballot packets unique to every voting jurisdiction in the United States for the 2020 election cycle PLUS be able to match the signatures on file of the individual voters they were attempting to impersonate.

To believe that could happen, Trump would have to be delusional. Which, let's face it, isn't out of the realm of possibility. Ignorance, on the other hand, is not just a possibility but almost a certainty; he's profoundly ignorant of how government works. But I'm opting for lying, simply because that's Trump's natural response to almost everything.

Posted on

A Mask is a Stupid Hill to Die On, America

From John Pavlovitz:

Yesterday, I stumbled into a war zone.

A friend of mine was being besieged on social media by a furious crossfire of rapid-fire vitriol from a disparate army of toddler moms and dudebros, in full-throated outrage because she'd had the stratospheric gall to post an article about the merits of wearing masks to prevent the exponential spread of a virus that has already ravaged the planet.

This apparently was a salvo so offensive that it could not go unpunished—so they began a brutal and coordinated keyboard frenzy.

It was a familiar sight, as this kind of virtual civil war is playing out thousands of times a day, and the responses to my friend were the fairly typical mix of anti-Science religious speak, 'roided-up tough guy posturing—and lots and lots of flag-waving, chest pounding, Don't Tread On Me nationalism. (Not wearing a mask, apparently makes America great—somehow.)

A mask?

This is where we are, America?

That's what it's come down to?

Half of you still won't do this?

Despite how many people have died, despite how decimated our economy is, despite the near complete shutdown of life (that you've been moaning like a dirty-diapered infant for months about)—this minuscule task is too much to ask?

A mask is the small, selfish, ignorant hill you're choosing to die (and kill) on?

The multitudinous non-maskers aren't a monolith, of course, but most can be loosely organized into two groups:

1) Self-centered narcissists, who simply refuse to make the smallest sacrifice for the health and well-being of others, because they've been so weaned on individualism and have so little appreciation for interdependent community—that anything less than completely unfettered freedom feels restrictive.

2) People with such a cultic adoration of this President that they refuse to wear a mask, because to do so would mean that he was wrong all along and that they were lied to and that we are in grave danger—so in an oxymoronic attempt at self-preservation, they swallow a toxic cocktail of tearful nationalism, Fox News fakery, macho flexing, and willful ignorance—and kill people to own the Libs.

Non-maskers, this isn't about your personal freedom.

It is not akin to choosing whether or not to wear a seatbelt—it's choosing whether or not to drive blindly into a crowd. It is deciding to place other people in danger along with yourself. Saying, "If you want to wear a mask, fine, but don't force me to," is an explicit declaration of an ignorance that can't or won't tell the difference between a choice that affects only you and one that affect everyone.

This isn't about physical toughness, either.

One of the oddest phenomenons is people flexing in the face of a pandemic, as if not wearing a mask proves toughness. It doesn't. It proves you don't pay attention, that you don't respect science, that you reject critical thinking, and that you lack working empathy. It's nothing to boast about.

One of my friend's maskless assailants came in late to the battle, with the kind of rhetorical, passive-aggressive query that feigns curiosity but really doesn't want an answer.

He wrote:

"So, what's the plan, here? What do you want to see happen? Are we going to wear masks for the rest of our lives? Are we going to live in fear forever? Help me understand your long-term plan?"

The "long-term plan," oh maskless ones, is to be a decent human being, to distance, to use restraint, and to wear a mask because 120,000 people have died in four months, because there is no treatment and there is no vaccine—and until there is, people fortunate enough not to be planning funerals right now, shouldn't act like a piece of cloth over their mouths is oppression or hardship.

Stop pretending you're suffering when you're just being asked to be a decent human being.
Berating someone for asking you to be considerate is as low as it gets. It shows an immaturity that cannot feel compassion for others in pain and doesn't understand adult accountability.
Shooting side eyes or mocking people at the store who have more consideration for humanity than you do, is only a projection of an insecurity that suspects this is a really stupid cause to push against.

We have these casualty numbers (which you claim are negligible) precisely with and because of months of shutdowns and safeguards—not in spite of them. If we hadn't adhered to these practices and restrictions, the numbers would be exponentially higher; the same way we'll see continued spiking because of people like you are strident in your steadfast refusal to care. If everyone wore masks, we could have a relatively normal existence without massive infections, but because half of us won't, we'll be in this another 8 months, and many more people will get sick and die.

If you refuse to wear a mask in a pandemic, you're not making America great.

You're abusing your freedom, you're intentionally placing fellow citizens in harm's way, you're damaging the economy, and you're dooming us to far longer restrictions than if you simply put a piece of cloth over your mouth.

If you refuse to wear a mask in a pandemic, you're also not pro-life.

You are showing a reckless disregard for yourself and for loved ones and for strangers; the supposedly sacred lives you preach to treasure in the womb, but in practice really aren't all that concerned with outside of it.

And if you refuse to wear a mask in a pandemic—you're just not a very good person.

We're in an unprecedented health crisis that has literally shut down the world, and you won't do literally the simplest thing you're being asked to, in order to prevent other people from getting sick and dying.

Congratulations. You're failing the "human" test.

Enjoy your hill.

It will look great with a headstone.

Note: Obviously, people with health conditions and PTSD which make wearing a mask difficult or impossible are exempt from this piece. (The rest of you know who you are.)