Why Is This Motherfucker Still Walking Free?
Great Restraint
The Republicans Don't Realize What They've Unleashed
Succinct
Asking for a Friend
Everyone Needs To…
"On" Also Works
Republican Hypocrisy
I Cannot Be More Clear
Take a Deep Breath…
…and repeat after me:
It is an opinion, not a ruling.
It is an opinion, not a ruling.
It is an opinion, not a ruling.
Yes, this definitely has the potential to turn into something truly horrific. And don't think for one second that the same religious lunatics who have their sights set on Roe don't also have designs upon Obergefell, Lawrence, Loving, and a host of other landmark civil rights decisions of the last sixty years. I don't think it's hyperbole to say that the right wing of this country want to turn the United States into a Republican wet dream dystopian handmaid's-tale theocratic hellscape where only straight, white, heterosexual christian males have rights or power.
While certain members of the court are already timidly braking, assuring everyone "the leaked draft is real but not final and can change," I don't believe a word of it. But I hope the backlash that results from this premature ejaculation will cause them to at least rethink it.
Fuck Alito. Fuck Cavanaugh. Fuck Gorsch. Fuck Thomas. Fuck Barrett. And most of all fuck Trump and McConnell and every.single.person who voted for the assholes who put those monsters in place.
The majority of the country is firmly in agreement with a woman's right to choose—as well as interracial marriage, gay marriage, and freedom to have sex with another consenting adult regardless of their sex.
And I find it ironic that the usual suspects on the far right are already braying about the leak itself, not its contents. They're more concerned that this information was released—no doubt because of the possibility that this will influence the midterm elections in the Democrats' favor—than they are at the contents of the leak and the warning klaxon it's sounding for rights across this country.
Maybe that's why it was leaked. Perhaps it was put out there by someone in full support of a woman's right to choose, hoping that the sleeping giant that is the majority of voters in this county can be woken from its slumber to beat this kind of mid-century nonsense back into the ground. This is something that has the potential to touch every single life in this country—and the right wing is scared shitless that when people wake up and realize this, they're toast.
And that is why it is vitally important that everyone vote BLUE in November.
At least that's the belief keeping me sane at the moment.
Why Do You Think Republicans Are Trying to Kill Public School?
Lauren Boebert's Tweet To Elon Musk Claiming The Left Only Wants 'Censorship' Backfired Instantly
Colorado Republican Representative Lauren Boebert was criticized after she claimed "leftists" opposed to billionaire Elon Musk's recent move to buy Twitter only want "censorship."
While Musk's buyout was cheered by conservatives, it sparked concern from other—especially civil rights groups—who said that having one person have so much centralized power over political discourse online poses a significant threat to democracy.
Musk batted away these criticisms, saying his opponents are experiencing an "extreme antibody reaction" because they "fear free speech."
And Boebert agreed, claiming Musk's opponents not only want to censor him but that "Their ideas don't hold up in debate."
All they have is censorship. Their ideas don't hold up in debate.
— Lauren Boebert (@laurenboebert) April 26, 2022
Musk has continued to allege Twitter's algorithms are biased and conservatives have applauded his buyout as a win for free speech, which Boebert has often claimed is threatened on the social media platform, thereby constituting a First Amendment violation.
However, these claims do not hold up under scrutiny.
The First Amendment applies only to governmental action and does not apply to behavior by private employers, private companies, or private, non-government individuals unless they worked in concert with the government.
Ironically, Boebert's Twitter activities have occasionally violated the First Amendment given she has previously blocked her constituents and was sued because she cannot legally block anyone who finds any of her tweets objectionable.
In 2019, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled online pages used by public figures to connect with their constituents are public forums, which means an official cannot block people from them because of the opinions they hold.
Boebert's tweet garnered significant attention.
Her claims were swiftly criticized by those who pointed out Republicans have recently ramped up a campaign to ban books and limit what subjects teachers can teach in their classrooms.
Have you done anything for your constituents? https://t.co/L9xr4Vy8Vf
— Frank Thorne (@frankthorne11) April 27, 2022
@laurenboebert you are far too ignorant to debate anyone. You prove your ignorance every time you open your mouth. https://t.co/jwsZDTThoN
— Chris Schuck (@lauging_f) April 27, 2022
Censorship?? It's YOUR party that's banning books and telling teachers what they can discuss in class. That's CENSORSHIP and cancel culture, you twit. https://t.co/K0VihWZ7km
— Proud and Hopeful Dem (@BigMoviebuff56) April 27, 2022
https://twitter.com/johnhassomesoap/status/1519261642931978240
So, you've decided to stop banning books & dictating how teachers should do their jobs? It's only censorship if it's your side? Or is it accountability? https://t.co/v0tjwHOO89
— KaRAYgeous ⸆⸉ 🪻🏹 (@kraywhiseheart) April 26, 2022
She must be talking about the GOP … don't say gay bill, banning (even math) books, CRT, #GOPHypocrisy https://t.co/TxiwnxYMp6
— Dr. C (@malialavender) April 26, 2022
You have no ideas good or bad. Just culture wars. You have to rig the voting districts, and restrict voting rights because he can't ever get a majority to vote for you. https://t.co/3Nu3L7lsYi
— SpottinGriftersSince92 (@SpottinGrifter1) April 26, 2022
https://twitter.com/Wildchildwendy/status/1519111477617205250
The @GOP is literally censoring /banning books & passing laws against LGBTQ people and is afraid of science & of "woke" ideas and tried to cancel
An election After they couldn't sensor the results
All they have is censorship https://t.co/ScyqAGYjjo— DangerGirl (@DangerGirl6) April 27, 2022
Earlier this week, the Twitter board of directors agreed to a $44 billion buyout by Musk, potentially making it one of the biggest deals to turn a company private.
Twitter previously acknowledged it had received Musk's bid, which comes out to $54.20 a share. The company confirmed in a press release its board of directors received the offer and would "carefully review the proposal to determine the course of action that it believes is in the best interest of the Company and all Twitter stockholders."
Rumors of a buyout began to circulate earlier this month after Musk disclosed a 9.2 percent stake in Twitter made him the company's largest shareholder. Prominent conservatives appeared emboldened by the news, particularly because Musk had questioned Twitter's content moderation rules in the days before his disclosure.
At the time, there was significant speculation Musk would join Twitter's board of directors, a move that would potentially broaden his influence over the platform and its policies.
Republicans, spurred by former President Donald Trump, have often accused Twitter of limiting prominent conservative voices on its platform.
In 2018, while still in office, Trump claimed Twitter was "SHADOW BANNING prominent Republicans" in response to a news story that alleged accounts owned by Republicans were showing up in a general search of the website but not automatically populating when typing their names in the drop-down bar.
Twitter later issued a response, attributing the issue to a platform bug.
[Source]